Open an E*TRADE Money Market Account--4.75% APY for 3 months
Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Books

BOOKS OF THE TIMES; Camus as a Principled Rebel Among Poseurs

Published: December 19, 1997


ALBERT CAMUS
A Life
By Olivier Todd
Translated by Benjamin Ivry. Illustrated. 436 pages. Alfred A. Knopf. $30.

Of all the major French literary figures of the 1950's and 1960's, the ''hommes engages'' who combined books with political activism, Albert Camus has perhaps best stood the test of time. His friend and later bitter rival Jean-Paul Sartre seems, in retrospect, a trendy poseur discredited by his abject failure to repudiate left-wing totalitarianism. And while Simone de Beauvoir is remembered for her pioneering feminism, her novels have been largely forgotten, especially outside of France. It seems a fair bet that Camus, too, is less than widely read these days; and yet he endures, or he should, for two reasons.

First, his major works of fiction, especially ''The Stranger'' and ''The Plague,'' retain the moral immediacy that made them celebrated when they were first published half a century ago, and so do the philosophical books, ''The Myth of Sisyphus'' and ''The Rebel,'' that accompanied them. Equally important, Camus, especially in his willingness to denounce the atrocities of Stalin and the third-world dictators embraced by the romantic left, demonstrated a political clearheadedness lamentably rare among his literary peers.

''Camus saved the honor of intellectuals who were caught up in a drift toward totalitarianism,'' writes Olivier Todd in ''Albert Camus: A Life,'' his new biography of the writer, translated and abridged from the French by Benjamin Ivry. In contrast to the more crowd-pleasing stalwarts of the French literary elite, Mr. Todd persuasively declares, ''Camus refused politics without morality.''

Mr. Todd's is the latest of many biographies of Camus. Earlier books, especially the huge, pioneering work by Herbert R. Lottman and the later, less reverential biography by Patrick McCarthy, may be more accessible to Americans than Mr. Todd's, which adds detail but does not much alter the overall view. Mr. Todd's book, nonetheless, is brisk and detailed, and the author has made a concerted effort to understand Camus's writings in light of his life.

Mr. Todd, a well-known Parisian magazine journalist and the author of numerous books, portrays Camus as an admirable, brave, tortured and complex figure, a fighter against lifelong tuberculosis but also an irrepressible Don Juan unwilling to put up the slightest resistance to amorous adventure, despite the pain it caused his long-suffering wife. He was also a man so imbued with a sense of his own moral indispensability that, in the apt phrase of Sartre (who seems badly placed to make such judgments), he seemed to carry a portable pedestal around with him wherever he went.

Mr. Todd's approach is to lay out the facts with a minimum of interpretation, adhering to a strict chronological narrative, beginning with Camus's birth in Algiers in 1913 and ending with his death in an automobile accident in 1960 when he was 46. Mr. Todd's minimalist commentary allows readers to draw their own themes, but surely among the most pronounced is Camus's status as a perpetual outsider, a Frenchman from Algeria, a chronically sick man among the healthy, a man of integrity who dwelled in a dishonest intellectual milieu self-deluding in its devotion to revolutionary fads.

After the appearance of ''The Rebel,'' which Mr. Todd proclaims ''a pioneering attack on Stalinist communism,'' one that made its author ''the only widely known French writer coming from the left wing to take such decisive positions,'' Camus declined to eat in some of his favorite restaurants so as not to run into his adversary, Sartre. Though a member of the Resistance during World War II, Camus opposed the death penalty for collaborators. When, in the mid-1950's, the Algerian National Liberation Front began its campaign of terror, Camus was almost alone among the famous French writers in not supporting immediate independence. His origins in the white working class of Algiers led him to understand that there were two very separate populations whose interests needed to be accommodated in a just solution, the Muslims and the non-Muslims.