EP2244491B2 - Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer - Google Patents
Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2244491B2 EP2244491B2 EP10155131.5A EP10155131A EP2244491B2 EP 2244491 B2 EP2244491 B2 EP 2244491B2 EP 10155131 A EP10155131 A EP 10155131A EP 2244491 B2 EP2244491 B2 EP 2244491B2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- frequency
- signal
- cut
- input signal
- low
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 title claims description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003454 tympanic membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/45—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
- H04R25/453—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback electronically
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R2430/00—Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
- H04R2430/03—Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing
Definitions
- the invention relates to a specified in claim 1 method for operating a hearing and a specified in claim 6 hearing with a crossover.
- frequency-distorting algorithms are used for different purposes and at different points of signal processing. For example, is from the DE 699 22 940 T2 a hearing aid with a combination of audio compression and feedback suppression known.
- Common to all frequency-distorting algorithms is that they should usually only act from a so-called cut-off frequency, because distortions of low frequencies disturb the sound impression, but distortions of high frequencies are less critical.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary implementation of a frequency distortion in a hearing aid.
- An input signal 100 is divided by a crossover filter 1 ("split-band filter") with a predefinable limit frequency GF ("split frequency”) into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component 101, 102.
- the high-frequency signal component 102 is then distorted in a frequency equalizer 2.
- the distorted output signal 103 is supplied to an input of an adder 3.
- the low-frequency signal component 101 passes through an all-pass filter 4, which rotates the phase of the signal component 101 in such a way that signal deletion in the region of the limit frequency GF does not occur during a subsequent signal addition in the adder 3.
- the phase-rotated low-frequency signal component 104 is supplied to a further input of the adder 3. At the output of the adder 3, the sum of the two signal components 103, 104 is available as an output signal 105.
- Crossovers are not ideal and have a finite frequency overlap at their cutoff frequency GF.
- FIG. 2 is shown as an example of the frequency response of a crossover in a hearing aid with the limit frequency GF 1800 Hz.
- the curves K1, K2 show the damping D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz in the range 0 to 4000 Hz.
- the curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.
- the WO 93/20669 A1 discloses a hearing apparatus with a variable high-pass filter which attenuates a low-frequency range of a microphone signal of the hearing device for the suppression of noise.
- the stated object is achieved with the method for operating a hearing device of independent claim 1 and with the hearing device of independent claim 5.
- the invention claims a method for operating a hearing device by dividing an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component with a crossover and setting a cutoff frequency of the crossover based on an analysis of the input signal such that artifacts in an output signal of the hearing device are reduced.
- the invention offers the advantage that artefacts resulting from signal superimposition can be avoided.
- a further development of the method may comprise a distortion, for example compression or displacement, of the high-frequency signal component and superposition of the low-frequency signal component and the distorted high-frequency signal component relative to the output signal, whereby artifacts can be formed.
- a distortion for example compression or displacement
- Another embodiment of the method may include determining the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.
- the method may preferably include setting the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality. This effectively minimizes artifacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover network.
- the method may include detecting feedback, wherein the cutoff frequency is temporarily lowered upon detection of feedback.
- the invention also claims a hearing device with a crossover characterized by a frequency difference, which divides an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component.
- the hearing device also comprises a first means by which the cutoff frequency of the crossover can be adjusted based on an analysis of the input signal such that artefacts in an output signal of the hearing aid are reduced.
- the first means may be a switching logic.
- a further embodiment of the invention may comprise a frequency equalizer which distorts, for example compresses or shifts, the high-frequency signal component.
- the hearing device can further iron on an adder, which forms the output signal by superimposing the low-frequency signal component with de-distorted high-frequency signal component, wherein artifacts can be formed.
- the first means can determine the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.
- the first means can set the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality.
- the hearing device may comprise a feedback suppression with a feedback detector, which temporarily lowers the cutoff frequency upon occurrence of a feedback.
- FIG. 3 shows in three graphs the effect of the cutoff frequency GF of a crossover in a hearing device in a typical application.
- the upper diagram shows the frequency response K3 of the signal amplitude A in dB of an input signal, for example a microphone signal, as a function of the frequency F in Hz between 0 and 4000 Hz.
- a flute tone with a fundamental tone P1 unfavorably falls exactly to the limit frequency GF 1800 Hz of the crossover.
- the middle graph of the FIG. 3 shows the frequency response of the crossover with a cut-off frequency GF at 1800 Hz.
- the curves K1, K2 indicate the attenuations D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz.
- the curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.
- At the outputs of the crossover are thus a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component available.
- the high-frequency signal component is now shifted upwards by 100 Hz in frequency.
- the curve K4 shows an output signal with a prominent double mode P2, which is perceived as a strong distortion.
- the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover is set, for example, to 1200 Hz.
- this effect of the invention is shown in three graphs.
- the upper diagram shows as in FIG. 3 the frequency response K3 of the signal amplitude A in dB of an input signal as a function of the frequency F in Hz between 0 and 4000 Hz.
- a flute tone has its root P1 at 1800 Hz.
- the middle graph of the FIG. 4 shows the frequency response of the crossover with a shifted to 1200 Hz limit frequency GF.
- the curves K1, K2 indicate the attenuations D in dB as a function of the frequency F in Hz.
- the curve K1 shows a low-pass characteristic and the curve K2 a high-pass characteristic.
- At the outputs of the crossover are thus a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component available.
- the high-frequency signal component is now shifted upwards by 100 Hz in frequency.
- the crossover frequency GF of the crossover can be freely adjusted within a certain frequency range, overlapping artifacts can be significantly reduced by analyzing an input signal either for signal volume A or tonality and then setting the cutoff frequency accordingly.
- the cutoff frequency is set to a frequency at which the input signal has a particularly low signal amplitude A or is particularly tonal.
- FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a typical embodiment of the invention.
- An input signal 100 of a hearing device for example a microphone signal
- a crossover network 1 with a predefinable limit frequency GF into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component 101, 102.
- the high-frequency signal portion 102 is then distorted in a frequency equalizer 2, for example, frequency-compressed or shifted the frequency.
- Such a distorted output signal 103 is supplied to an input of an adder 3.
- the low-frequency signal component 101 passes through an all-pass filter 4, which rotates the phase in such a way that signal deletions in the region of the limit frequency GF do not occur during a subsequent signal addition in the adder 3.
- the phase-rotated low-frequency signal component 104 is supplied to a further input of the adder 3. At the output of the adder 3 is available as a sum, an output signal 105 is available.
- the input signal 100 is split into frequency bands 106 with the aid of a filter bank 5.
- the bands 106 are then analyzed in a switching logic 6 with respect to their signal amplitude. From a predeterminable list of possible cutoff frequencies, for example 1000 Hz, 1250 Hz, 1500 Hz and 2000 Hz, that is selected in whose environment the signal level is as low as possible.
- the crossover 1 With an output signal 107 of the switching logic 6, the crossover 1 is now faded to this selected limit frequency GF.
- the shift of the limit frequency GF artefacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover 1 thus minimized.
- a frequency distortion for improved feedback suppression in hearing devices may, depending on the ear coupling, in addition to the described "electrical" superposition also to an acoustic superposition of sound from the hearing and sound that comes directly to the eardrum acoustically come. This is due to physical reasons, especially at low frequencies.
- the problem arises that undistorted signal components over the physical path overlap with intended distorted signal components via the hearing device in the same frequency band and lead to unwanted artifacts. Since this occurs preferably at low frequencies, the countermeasure would be to increase the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover 1 to such an extent that the superimposition occurring becomes insignificant. However, this increases the risk of feedback whistles in the low frequency band.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Tone Control, Compression And Expansion, Limiting Amplitude (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
- Amplifiers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein im Patentanspruch 1 angegebenes Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung und eine im Patentanspruch 6 angegebene Hörvorrichtung mit einer Frequenzweiche.The invention relates to a specified in claim 1 method for operating a hearing and a specified in
Bei Hörvorrichtungen, insbesondere bei Hörgeräten, werden frequenzverzerrende Algorithmen zu unterschiedlichen Zwecken und an unterschiedlichen Stellen einer Signalverarbeitung eingesetzt. Beispielsweise ist aus der
Frequenzweichen sind nicht ideal und haben bei ihrer Grenzfrequenz GF eine endliche Frequenzüberlappung. In
Wird nun ein Tiefpass K1 gefilterter Signalanteil nicht verzerrt und ein Hochpass K2 gefilterter Signalanteil verzerrt, kommt es bei einer Addition der Signalanteile K1, K2 vor allem im Bereich der Grenzfrequenz GF zu nicht zu vernachlässigenden Überlagerungen von beiden Signalanteilen was in einem Ausgangssignal des Hörgeräts als Modulation oder starke Rauhigkeit wahrgenommen wird. Beide Wirkungen sind sehr störend und fallen in der Wahrnehmung durch einen Hörgeräteträger meist deutlich stärker auf als die Frequenzverzerrung an sich.If a low-pass K1 filtered signal component is not distorted and a high-pass K2 filtered signal component is distorted, superimposing of both signal components occurs in addition to the signal components K1, K2, above all in the region of the limit frequency GF, which results in an output signal of the hearing aid as modulation or strong roughness is perceived. Both effects are very disturbing and usually noticeably more noticeable in the perception by a hearing aid wearer than the frequency distortion itself.
Neben dieser "elektrischen" Signalüberlagerung kann es aber auch zu einer akustischen Überlagerung von einem frequenzverzerrtem und einem nicht frequenzverzerrtem Signal kommen. Besonders in den tiefen Frequenzbereichen und bei einer offenen Hörgeräteversorgung ist eine akustische Überlagerung nicht zu vernachlässigen. Direktschall überlagert sich mit dem frequenzverzerrten Signalanteil, den das Hörgerät ausgibt, was wiederum zu den bereits beschriebenen Artefakten führt.In addition to this "electrical" signal superposition, it can also lead to an acoustic superposition of a frequency-distorted and a non-frequency-distorted signal. Especially in the low frequency ranges and with an open hearing aid supply, an acoustic overlay is not negligible. Direct sound is superimposed on the frequency-distorted signal component that the hearing aid outputs, which in turn leads to the artefacts already described.
Die
Es ist Aufgabe der Erfindung die geschilderten Nachteile zu überwinden und ein Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung und eine Hörvorrichtung mit Frequenzweiche anzugeben, die ein Auftreten von Artefakten bei einer Überlagerung von unverzerrten und frequenzverzerrten Signalanteilen reduzieren.It is an object of the invention to overcome the disadvantages described and to provide a method for operating a hearing device and a hearing device with crossover, which reduce the occurrence of artifacts in a superposition of undistorted and frequency-distorted signal components.
Gemäß der Erfindung wird die gestellte Aufgabe mit dem Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 1 und mit der Hörvorrichtung des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 5 gelöst.According to the invention, the stated object is achieved with the method for operating a hearing device of independent claim 1 and with the hearing device of
Die Erfindung beansprucht ein Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Hörvorrichtung durch Aufteilen eines Eingangssignals in einen niederfrequenten und einen hochfrequenten Signalanteil mit einer Frequenzweiche und durch Einstellen einer Grenzfrequenz der Frequenzweiche aufgrund einer Analyse des Eingangssignals derart, dass Artefakte in einem Ausgangssignal der Hörvorrichtung reduziert werden. Die Erfindung bietet den Vorteil, dass durch Signalüberlagerung entstehende Artefakte vermieden werden können.The invention claims a method for operating a hearing device by dividing an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component with a crossover and setting a cutoff frequency of the crossover based on an analysis of the input signal such that artifacts in an output signal of the hearing device are reduced. The invention offers the advantage that artefacts resulting from signal superimposition can be avoided.
Eine Weiterbildung des Verfahrens kann ein Verzerren, beispielweise ein Komprimieren oder Verschieben, des hochfrequenten Signalanteils und ein Überlagern des niederfrequenten Signalanteils und des verzerrten hochfrequenten Signalanteils zu dem Ausgangssignal umfassen, wobei Artefakte gebildet werden können.A further development of the method may comprise a distortion, for example compression or displacement, of the high-frequency signal component and superposition of the low-frequency signal component and the distorted high-frequency signal component relative to the output signal, whereby artifacts can be formed.
Eine weitere Ausführungsform des Verfahrens kann ein Ermitteln der Grenzfrequenz durch Analysieren des Signalpegels oder der Tonalität des Eingangssignals umfassen.Another embodiment of the method may include determining the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.
Vorzugsweise kann das Verfahren ein Einstellen der Grenzfrequenz auf eine Frequenz, bei der das Eingangssignal einen möglichst geringen Signalpegel und/oder eine möglichst geringe Tonalität aufweist, umfassen. Dadurch werden Artefakte, die durch überlappende Bänder der Frequenzweiche entstehen, effektiv minimiert.The method may preferably include setting the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality. This effectively minimizes artifacts caused by overlapping bands of the crossover network.
Des Weiteren kann das Verfahren eine Detektion von Rückkopplungen umfassen, wobei die Grenzfrequenz bei einem Erkennen einer Rückkopplung vorübergehend abgesenkt wird. Vorteilhaft daran ist, dass Rückkopplungspfeifen infolge einer ungünstigen Grenzfrequenz vermieden wird.Furthermore, the method may include detecting feedback, wherein the cutoff frequency is temporarily lowered upon detection of feedback. The advantage of this is that feedback whistles is avoided as a result of an unfavorable cut-off frequency.
Die Erfindung beansprucht auch eine Hörvorrichtung mit einer durch eine Grenzfrequenz charakterisierten Frequenzweiche, die ein Eingangssignal in einen niederfrequenten und einen hochfrequenten Signalanteil aufteilt. Die Hörvorrichtung umfasst außerdem ein erstes Mittel, durch das die Grenzfrequenz der Frequenzweiche aufgrund einer Analyse des Eingangssignals derart einstellbar ist, dass Artefakte in einem Ausgangssignal des Hörgeräts reduziert werden. Das erste Mittel kann eine Umschaltlogik sein.The invention also claims a hearing device with a crossover characterized by a frequency difference, which divides an input signal into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component. The hearing device also comprises a first means by which the cutoff frequency of the crossover can be adjusted based on an analysis of the input signal such that artefacts in an output signal of the hearing aid are reduced. The first means may be a switching logic.
Eine weitere Ausführungsform der Erfindung kann einen Frequenzverzerrer umfassen, der den hochfrequenten Signalanteil verzerrt, beispielweise komprimiert oder verschiebt. Die Hörvorrichtung kann des Weiteren einen Addierer aufeisen, der durch Überlagerung des niederfrequenten Signalanteils mit deverzerrten hochfrequenten Signalanteil das Ausgangssignal bildet, wobei Artefakte bildbar sind.A further embodiment of the invention may comprise a frequency equalizer which distorts, for example compresses or shifts, the high-frequency signal component. The hearing device can further iron on an adder, which forms the output signal by superimposing the low-frequency signal component with de-distorted high-frequency signal component, wherein artifacts can be formed.
In einer Weiterbildung kann das erste Mittel die Grenzfrequenz durch Analysieren des Signalpegels oder der Tonalität des Eingangssignals ermitteln.In a development, the first means can determine the cutoff frequency by analyzing the signal level or the tonality of the input signal.
Vorzugsweise kann das erste Mittel die Grenzfrequenz auf eine Frequenz einstellen, bei der das Eingangssignal einen möglichst geringen Signalpegel und/oder eine möglichst geringe Tonalität aufweist.Preferably, the first means can set the cutoff frequency to a frequency at which the input signal has the lowest possible signal level and / or the lowest possible tonality.
Des Weiteren kann die Hörvorrichtung eine Rückkopplungsunterdrückung mit einem Rückkopplungsdetektor umfassen, der die Grenzfrequenz bei einem Auftreten einer Rückkopplung vorübergehend absenkt.Furthermore, the hearing device may comprise a feedback suppression with a feedback detector, which temporarily lowers the cutoff frequency upon occurrence of a feedback.
Weitere Besonderheiten und Vorteile der Erfindung werden aus den nachfolgenden Erläuterungen eines Ausführungsbeispiels anhand von schematischen Zeichnungen ersichtlich.Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following explanations of an embodiment with reference to schematic drawings.
Es zeigen:
- Figur 1:
- ein Blockschaltbild einer Anordnung mit Frequenz- weiche gemäß Stand der Technik,
- Figur 2:
- ein Schaubild eines Frequenzgangs einer Frequenz- weiche gemäß Stand der Technik,
- Figur 3:
- Schaubilder von Frequenzgängen bei einem Hörgerät gemäß Stand der Technik,
- Figur 4:
- Schaubilder von Frequenzgängen bei einem erfin- dungsgemäßen Hörgerät und
- Figur 5:
- ein Blockschaltbild einer erfindungsgemäßen Anord- nung.
- FIG. 1:
- 1 is a block diagram of a prior art frequency-locked device;
- FIG. 2:
- 4 is a graph of a frequency response of a frequency sweep according to the prior art;
- FIG. 3:
- Charts of frequency responses in a hearing aid according to the prior art,
- FIG. 4:
- Charts of frequency responses in a hearing aid according to the invention and
- FIG. 5:
- a block diagram of an arrangement according to the invention.
Das mittlere Schaubild der
Werden der um 100 Hz frequenzverschobene hochfrequente Signalanteil und der unverzerrte niederfrequente Signalanteil addiert, ergibt sich ein Frequenzgang K4 entsprechend dem unteren Schaubild der
Erfindungsgemäß wird nun diese starke Verzerrung vermieden, indem die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche beispielsweise auf 1200 Hz eingestellt wird. In
Das mittlere Schaubild der
Werden der um 100 Hz frequenzverschobene hochfrequente Signalanteil und der unverzerrte niederfrequente Signalanteil addiert, ergibt sich ein Frequenzgang K5 entsprechend dem unteren Schaubild der
Mit dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren kann daher sehr effektiv eine störende "elektrische" Überlagerung vermieden bzw. unhörbar gemacht werden. Die erfindungsgemäße Lösung kann unabhängig von einer aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten An-Ausschalt-Logik eingesetzt werden, wodurch sich die Vorteile ergänzen können.With the method according to the invention, therefore, a disturbing "electrical" superposition can be very effectively avoided or rendered inaudible. The solution according to the invention can be used independently of a known from the prior art on-off logic, which can complement the benefits.
Kann die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche in einem bestimmten Frequenzbereich frei eingestellt werden, können Überlappungsartefakte deutlich reduziert werden, indem ein Eingangssignal entweder nach Signallautstärke A oder nach Tonalität analysiert und dann die Grenzfrequenz entsprechend eingestellt wird. Bevorzugt wird die Grenzfrequenz auf eine Frequenz gestellt, bei der das Eingangssignal besonders wenig Signalamplitude A aufweist oder besonders wenig tonal ist.If the crossover frequency GF of the crossover can be freely adjusted within a certain frequency range, overlapping artifacts can be significantly reduced by analyzing an input signal either for signal volume A or tonality and then setting the cutoff frequency accordingly. Preferably, the cutoff frequency is set to a frequency at which the input signal has a particularly low signal amplitude A or is particularly tonal.
Zur erfindungsgemäßen Einstellung bzw. Regelung der Grenzfrequenz GF wird das Eingangssignal 100 mit Hilfe einer Filterbank 5 in Frequenzbänder 106 zerlegt. Die Bänder 106 werden anschließend in einer Umschaltlogik 6 in Bezug auf ihre Signalamplitude analysiert. Aus einer vorgebbaren Liste von möglichen Grenzfrequenzen, beispielsweise 1000 Hz, 1250 Hz, 1500 Hz und 2000 Hz, wird diejenige ausgewählt, in deren Umgebung der Signalpegel möglichst gering ist. Mit einem Ausgangssignal 107 der Umschaltlogik 6 wird nun die Frequenzweiche 1 zu dieser ausgewählten Grenzfrequenz GF übergeblendet. Infolge der Verschiebung der Grenzfrequenz GF werden Artefakte, die durch überlappende Bänder der Frequenzweiche 1 entstehen, somit minimiert.For adjusting or regulating the limit frequency GF according to the invention, the
Für den Fall einer Frequenzverzerrung zur verbesserten Rückkopplungsunterdrückung bei Hörvorrichtungen kann es, je nach Ohrankopplung, neben der beschriebenen "elektrischen" Überlagerung auch zu einer akustischen Überlagerung von Schall aus der Hörvorrichtung und Schall, der akustisch direkt an das Trommelfell gelangt, kommen. Dies erfolgt physikalisch bedingt vor allem bei niedrigen Frequenzen. Auch hierbei tritt das Problem auf, dass sich unverzerrte Signalanteile über den physikalischen Pfad mit beabsichtigt verzerrten Signalanteilen über die Hörvorrichtung im selben Frequenzband überlagern und zu unerwünschten Artefakten führen. Da dies vorzugsweise bei tiefen Frequenzen auftritt, wäre die Gegenmaßnahme, die Grenzfrequenz GF der Frequenzweiche 1 soweit zu erhöhen, dass die auftretende Überlagerung unbedeutend wird. Dies erhöht jedoch das Risiko von Rückkopplungspfeifen im tiefen Frequenzband.In the case of a frequency distortion for improved feedback suppression in hearing devices may, depending on the ear coupling, in addition to the described "electrical" superposition also to an acoustic superposition of sound from the hearing and sound that comes directly to the eardrum acoustically come. This is due to physical reasons, especially at low frequencies. Here, too, the problem arises that undistorted signal components over the physical path overlap with intended distorted signal components via the hearing device in the same frequency band and lead to unwanted artifacts. Since this occurs preferably at low frequencies, the countermeasure would be to increase the cutoff frequency GF of the crossover 1 to such an extent that the superimposition occurring becomes insignificant. However, this increases the risk of feedback whistles in the low frequency band.
Eine vorteilhafte Abhilfe hierzu stellt die Kombination des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens mit einem Rückkopplungsdetektor 7 gemäß
- 11
- Frequenzweiche / Split-Band FilterCrossover / split band filter
- 22
- FrequenzverzerrerFrequenzverzerrer
- 33
- Addiereradder
- 44
- All-Pass FilterAll-pass filter
- 55
- Filterbankfilter bank
- 66
- Umschaltlogikswitching logic
- 77
- RückkopplungsdetektorFeedback detector
- 100100
- Eingangssignal / MikrofonsignalInput signal / microphone signal
- 101101
- niederfrequentes SignalLow frequency signal
- 102102
- hochfrequentes Signalhigh-frequency signal
- 103103
- verzerrtes Signaldistorted signal
- 104104
- phasenkompensiertes Signalphase-compensated signal
- 105105
- Ausgangssignaloutput
- 106106
- Frequenzbänderfrequency bands
- 107107
- Ausgangssignal der UmschaltlogikOutput signal of the switching logic
- AA
- Signalamplitudesignal amplitude
- DD
- Dämpfungdamping
- FF
- Frequenzfrequency
- GFGF
- Grenzfrequenzcut-off frequency
- K1K1
- Frequenzgang TiefpassFrequency response lowpass
- K2K2
- Frequenzgang HochpassFrequency response high pass
- K3K3
-
Frequenzgang des Eingangssignals 100Frequency response of the
input signal 100 - K4K4
-
Frequenzgang des Ausgangssignals 105Frequency response of the
output signal 105 - K5K5
-
Frequenzgang des Ausgangssignals 105 nach Verschie- bung der Grenzfrequenz GFFrequency response of the
output signal 105 after shifting the limit frequency GF - P1P1
-
Grundton im Eingangssignal 100Basic tone in the
input signal 100 - P2P2
-
verzerrter Grundton im Ausgangssignal 105 / Modedistorted fundamental in
output signal 105 / mode - P3P3
-
unverzerrter Grundton im Ausgangssignal 105undistorted root in the
output signal 105
Claims (8)
- Method for operating a hearing apparatus, by:- splitting an input signal (100) of the hearing apparatus into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component (101, 102) by means of a crossover filter (1),- frequency distortion (2) of the high-frequency signal component (102) and- overlaying (3) the low-frequency signal component (104) and the distorted high-frequency signal component (103) to form the output signal (105)
characterised by:- setting (107) a predefinable cut-off frequency (GF) of the crossover filter (1) by analysing the input signal (100) so that artefacts in the output signal (105) are reduced. - Method according to claim 1, characterised by:- determining (6) the cut-off frequency (GF) by analysing the signal level (A) or tonality of the input signal (100).
- Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterised by,- setting (107) the cut-off frequency (GF) to a frequency, at which the input signal (100) has the lowest possible signal level (A) and/or the lowest possible tonality.
- Method according to one of claims 2 to 4, characterised by:- identifying (7) feedback, with the cut-off frequency (GF) being momentarily lowered when feedback is identified.
- Hearing apparatus with- a crossover filter (1) characterised by a cut-off frequency (GF), which splits an input signal (100) into a low-frequency and a high-frequency signal component (101, 102),- a frequency distorter (2), which distorts the high-frequency signal component (102), and- an adding unit (3), which forms an output signal (105) by overlaying the low-frequency signal component (104) with the distorted high-frequency signal component (103), characterised by:- a first means (6), which can be used to set the cut-off frequency (GF) based on an analysis of the input signal (100) using the first means (6) so that artefacts in the output signal (105) are reduced.
- Hearing apparatus according to claim 5, characterised in that the first means (6) determines the cut-off frequency (GF) by analysing the signal level (A) or tonality of the input signal (100).
- Hearing apparatus according to claims 5 or 6, characterised in that the first means (6) sets the cut-off frequency (GF) to a frequency, at which the input signal (100) has the lowest possible signal level (A) and/or the lowest possible tonality.
- Hearing apparatus according to one of claims 5 to 7 having feedback suppression, characterised by:- a feedback detector (7), which momentarily lowers the cut-off frequency (GF) when feedback is identified.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17225909P | 2009-04-24 | 2009-04-24 | |
DE102009018812.6A DE102009018812B4 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2009-04-24 | Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2244491A1 EP2244491A1 (en) | 2010-10-27 |
EP2244491B1 EP2244491B1 (en) | 2011-06-22 |
EP2244491B2 true EP2244491B2 (en) | 2014-09-17 |
Family
ID=42244270
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10155131.5A Active EP2244491B2 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2010-03-02 | Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8411885B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2244491B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE514291T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102009018812B4 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2244491T4 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102017203630B3 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-04-26 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal and hearing device operating according to this method |
DE102017203631B3 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-05-17 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal |
EP4478743A1 (en) * | 2023-06-12 | 2024-12-18 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102009018812B4 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2015-05-28 | Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. | Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network |
US11665482B2 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2023-05-30 | Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd. | Bone conduction speaker and compound vibration device thereof |
US11589172B2 (en) | 2014-01-06 | 2023-02-21 | Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for suppressing sound leakage |
EP2988529B1 (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2019-12-04 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Adaptive separation frequency in hearing aids |
US10666305B2 (en) | 2015-12-16 | 2020-05-26 | Kumu Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for linearized-mixer out-of-band interference mitigation |
DE102017200320A1 (en) | 2017-01-11 | 2018-07-12 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal |
EP3602776B1 (en) | 2017-03-27 | 2021-04-21 | Kumu Networks, Inc. | Enhanced linearity mixer |
NL2021071B1 (en) * | 2018-06-07 | 2019-12-13 | Interhear B V | Method for processing an audio signal for a hearing aid |
EP3834200A4 (en) | 2018-09-12 | 2021-08-25 | Shenzhen Voxtech Co., Ltd. | Signal processing device having multiple acoustic-electric transducers |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4099035A (en) † | 1976-07-20 | 1978-07-04 | Paul Yanick | Hearing aid with recruitment compensation |
US4882762A (en) † | 1988-02-23 | 1989-11-21 | Resound Corporation | Multi-band programmable compression system |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4790018A (en) * | 1987-02-11 | 1988-12-06 | Argosy Electronics | Frequency selection circuit for hearing aids |
US5278912A (en) * | 1991-06-28 | 1994-01-11 | Resound Corporation | Multiband programmable compression system |
US5285502A (en) * | 1992-03-31 | 1994-02-08 | Auditory System Technologies, Inc. | Aid to hearing speech in a noisy environment |
US5832097A (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 1998-11-03 | Gennum Corporation | Multi-channel synchronous companding system |
US6434246B1 (en) | 1995-10-10 | 2002-08-13 | Gn Resound As | Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid |
DE19619312A1 (en) * | 1996-05-13 | 1997-11-20 | Siemens Audiologische Technik | Amplification system for hearing aid input signals |
US6181801B1 (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 2001-01-30 | Resound Corporation | Wired open ear canal earpiece |
US5987146A (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 1999-11-16 | Resound Corporation | Ear canal microphone |
JP2967756B2 (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 1999-10-25 | 日本電気株式会社 | Track servo device for optical disk |
EP1016318A1 (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2000-07-05 | Beltone Netherlands B.V. | Hearing instrument |
US6831986B2 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2004-12-14 | Gn Resound A/S | Feedback cancellation in a hearing aid with reduced sensitivity to low-frequency tonal inputs |
DE10244184B3 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2004-04-15 | Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh | Feedback compensation for hearing aids with system distance estimation |
DK1742509T3 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2013-11-04 | Oticon As | A system and method for eliminating feedback and noise in a hearing aid |
JP5022792B2 (en) * | 2007-07-02 | 2012-09-12 | 株式会社日立国際電気 | DCDC converter unit, power amplifier, and base station apparatus |
DK2369859T3 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2017-03-13 | Sonova Ag | Method of adapting sound in a hearing aid by frequency change and such a device / Method of adapting sound in a hearing aid device by frequency modification and such a device |
DE102009018812B4 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2015-05-28 | Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. | Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network |
-
2009
- 2009-04-24 DE DE102009018812.6A patent/DE102009018812B4/en active Active
-
2010
- 2010-03-02 DK DK10155131.5T patent/DK2244491T4/en active
- 2010-03-02 AT AT10155131T patent/ATE514291T1/en active
- 2010-03-02 EP EP10155131.5A patent/EP2244491B2/en active Active
- 2010-04-26 US US12/767,064 patent/US8411885B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4099035A (en) † | 1976-07-20 | 1978-07-04 | Paul Yanick | Hearing aid with recruitment compensation |
US4882762A (en) † | 1988-02-23 | 1989-11-21 | Resound Corporation | Multi-band programmable compression system |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102017203630B3 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-04-26 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal and hearing device operating according to this method |
DE102017203631B3 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-05-17 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal |
US10397712B2 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2019-08-27 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal, method for suppressing an acoustic feedback in an acoustic system and hearing aid |
US10674283B2 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2020-06-02 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for distorting the frequency of an audio signal and hearing apparatus operating according to this method |
EP4478743A1 (en) * | 2023-06-12 | 2024-12-18 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DK2244491T4 (en) | 2015-01-05 |
US8411885B2 (en) | 2013-04-02 |
US20100272289A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 |
ATE514291T1 (en) | 2011-07-15 |
DK2244491T3 (en) | 2011-10-03 |
DE102009018812A1 (en) | 2010-11-11 |
EP2244491B1 (en) | 2011-06-22 |
DE102009018812B4 (en) | 2015-05-28 |
EP2244491A1 (en) | 2010-10-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2244491B2 (en) | Method for operating a hearing aid with feedback suppression and hearing aid with a diplexer | |
DE102006020832B4 (en) | Method for suppressing feedback in hearing devices | |
EP2180726B1 (en) | Sound localization in binaural hearing aids | |
EP1366564B1 (en) | Device for the noise-dependent adjustment of sound volumes | |
DE112012006457B4 (en) | Frequency characteristic modification device | |
DE102006047965A1 (en) | Method for the reduction of occlusion effects with acoustic device locking an auditory passage, involves using signal from transmission path of audio signal, and transmission function is observed by output of output converter | |
DE102009016845B3 (en) | Arrangement and method for detecting feedback in hearing devices | |
EP2437258A2 (en) | Method and device for frequency compression with selective frequency shifting | |
EP2023669A2 (en) | Method for operating a hearing aid system and hearing aid system | |
EP2360945B1 (en) | Hearing aid with frequency shift and accompanying method | |
DE102009021310B4 (en) | Binaural hearing apparatus and method for operating a binaural hearing apparatus with frequency distortion | |
DE10242700B4 (en) | Feedback compensator in an acoustic amplification system, hearing aid, method for feedback compensation and application of the method in a hearing aid | |
DE102004026801A1 (en) | Acoustic signal processing unit | |
EP2437521B1 (en) | Method for frequency compression with harmonic adjustment and corresponding device | |
DE102019111150A1 (en) | Audio system and method for controlling an audio system | |
DE102017203631B3 (en) | Method for frequency distortion of an audio signal | |
DE102018207780B3 (en) | Method for operating a hearing aid | |
DE102008058496B4 (en) | Filter bank system with specific stop attenuation components for a hearing device | |
DE202016101050U1 (en) | Device for configuring a user-specific hearing system | |
EP2648424B1 (en) | Method for limiting the output level in hearing aids | |
DE3840551C2 (en) | ||
DE10159928A1 (en) | Preventing oscillations in hearing aid caused by feedback involves reducing gain for lower input signal levels if oscillations detected, reducing it to lesser extent or not at all for higher levels | |
DE202010012133U1 (en) | Device for changing an audio signal via its frequency response | |
EP2575377A1 (en) | Amplification configuration for a hearing aid | |
DE102010044231A1 (en) | Device for changing audio signals over frequency range within frequency band in sound processing of movie and music, has interface changing and entering default parameter into absolute value, and dynamic processor downstream to output |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100820 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA ME RS |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H04R 25/00 20060101AFI20101208BHEP |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110804 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SIVANTOS PTE. LTD., SG Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE, SG Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MAIER, DANIEL OLIVER, DIPL.-ING. UNIV., DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20110622 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110922 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110923 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111022 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: GN RESOUND A/S (DK)/WIDEX A/S (DK)/ PHONAK AG (CH) Effective date: 20120322 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120322 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SIEMENS MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS PTE. LTD. Effective date: 20120331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111003 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110922 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 |
|
APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110622 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120302 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100302 |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20140917 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: AELC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T4 Effective date: 20141219 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502010000035 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SIVANTOS PTE. LTD., SG Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE, SG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 514291 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20150302 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150302 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240321 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240322 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240320 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20240321 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20240401 Year of fee payment: 15 |