IE84458B1

IE84458B1 - Method and apparatus for providing customer configured machines at an internet site"

Info

Publication number: IE84458B1
Application number: IE1999/0515A
Authority: IE
Inventors: Henson Ken
Original assignee: Dell Usa Lp
Filing date: 1999-06-18
Publication date: 2006-12-29

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMER CONFIGURED MACHINES AT AN INTERNET SITE DELL USA, L.P.

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMER CONFIGURED MACI-HNES AT AN H‘TTERNE'I‘ SITE Background 1. Field of the Invention The disclosures herein relate generally to built to order computer systems, and more particularly, to an online store user interface for enabling custom conﬁguration, pricing, and ordering of a computer system via the Internet.

. Discussion of the Related Art With a first generation web based on-line store, a customer was given an ability to select a base computer system (or chassis), customize the system, and price it. Such an on-line store focused initially upon the bare necessities. That is, build a system and get a price.

In the prior online store, a conﬁgurator allowed a customer to customize a system and procure it online. The conﬁgurator allowed a customer to select a given computer system model and to customize the computer system according to the user selected options. Such a conﬁgurator was most well received by persons in the know about a particular computer system, that is, those who were very self-sufficient vvithout the assistance of a sales representative. However, the earlier generation online store was not user ﬁiendly in than it merely Wet the appetite of the less sales- sufficient computer customers. In the later instance, the previous online store allowed such customers to answer one of their questions, but not all of them. Those customers still needed be assistance of a sales representative. In addition, with the prior online store, there was an assumption that in presenting all available options, the options all Work together and the customer wouldn‘t be creating a system that could not be built by manufacturing. That assumption was not always correct.

Further with respect to the previous generation on-line store, a disadvantage was that a customer could place an order and ﬁnd out only later, after the order was taken off of the on-line system and entered into another order management system, that the customer-conﬁgured system shipment would be delayed (ie., more than the typical build time and delivery). It was the order management system which would inform a sales representative to communicate with the customer. Typically, the sales representative who would inform the customer of a ﬁnal order amount and conﬁrmation of the order. In addition, it was only then that the customer would ﬁnd out that, “oh by the way, the delivery time for that system is ﬁve weeks.” At that, the customer would be highly inclined to cancel the order, since the customer thought that the system would be shipped within a typical delivery ﬁme (on the order of about a week). D The prior methods used for an online store included a web objects-based application providing the capability to custom-conﬁgure and order a particular computer system. The initial online store application oﬁered customers the ability to select and price key system options, the ability to include multiple systems on a single order, and the ability to provide information necessary for the placement of a standard computer system order.

The capability to self-select system options and then price them was afforded through the presence of an online conﬁgurator. This conﬁgurator enabled customer selection of key, system-deﬁning components ﬁrom a display of available system options for a chosen system. The display of available options included the presentation of a "delta" price, wherein a change in system price was affected by selection of an option. The conﬁgurator aﬁbrded the ability to update overall system priced based upon selections made. The capability to include multiple items in a single order was aﬁorded by the presence of a "shopping cart", wherein the Shopping cart represents an equivalent to the traditional shopping cart. The shopping cart enabled customers to group disparate systems together as an order, as well as specify a quantity for each individual system to be included on the order. Furthermore, the capability to provide customer-speciﬁc information required for the placement of a standard order was afforded through the presence of an online “checkout", the checkout including essentially a form for facilitating the capture of requested and required information. The checkout form included simple logic rules to assure entry of the required ﬁelds.

The prior generation web-based online store application was problematic in that a responsiveness to customer requests was becoming unacceptable, for example, on the order of upwards of ﬁfty percent (50%) of requests were unmet during peak business hours. Maintenance of a programming code for the online store was more time intensive and less scalable than desired. The feature set of the onljne store, oﬁered little to no point—of—sale merchandising capability. The feature set of the online store still further oﬁered no means for delivering more detailed option information. Yet still further, the feature set of the online store offered no means for warning customers as to known compatibility issues between select system options.

The feature set also oﬁered no means for communicating the effect selection of certain system options would have on the system's delivery time. A customization of the online store for use by various business segments Within the online store vendor. or computer system manufacturer was less than optimal. The net effect of the problems with the prior online store included lost business and decreased customer satisfaction with the online buying experience.

Other problems existed in the previous generation online store including a lack of responsiveness to customer requests. In addition, the previous generation online store suffered from an incompleteness of information delivery with respect to a servicing of customer demand for computer system related information. Still further, system incompatibility issues were not addressed. An improved accuracy, reliability, and overall quality of the online store and buying experience for overcoming the problems as discussed above is thus desired.

Sulnma According to one embodiment, a web-based online store having a user interface for enabling a custom conﬁguration of a computer system according to an identiﬁcation of a user belonging to a prescribed customer set includes a conﬁgurator, a cart, a checkout, and a database. The conﬁgurator is provided for conﬁguring a computer system with options selected according to a prescribed user input. The options and a respective pricing for each option are presented on a conﬁgurator web page in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to a prescribed customer set. The cart is provided for temporarily storing the customer conﬁgured computer system, wherein the cart includes a cart Web page. The checkout is provided for presenting payment options and for obtaining payment and delivery Lastly, the database is provided for dynamically supplying conﬁguration options to the information. The checkout further includes a checkout web page. configurator in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

In another embodiment, the configurator further includes merchandizing recommendations for available options and their respective option details, the rnercliandizing recommendations being presented on the conﬁgurator web page. The cart further includes merchandizing recommendations for add~on options, the .__........,..___,.~.__. _.._. merchandizing recommendations being presented on the cart web page. The payment options of the checkout are presented on the checkout web page. The database is further for dynamically supplying the merchandizing recommendations to the conﬁgurator in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set. The database is also further for dynamically supplying the merchandizing recommendations to the cart in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set. The database is still also further for dynamically supplying the payment options to the checkout in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set., In yet another embodiment, the conﬁgurator ﬁirther includes a warning indicator for indicating an option which is subject to adversely impact a shipment of the conﬁgured computer system. The online store includes yet other additional options and features as discussed herein. A online store user interface is disclosed also.

The online store of the present disclosure includes a single online store which advantageously generates a given online store View for a particular customer set, customizable per customer. While the online store has the appearance of many’ diﬁerent stores to many diﬁferent customers, in essence, it's the same core online store but customizable for each customer and database driven. Customization of the online store has thus been advantageously improved, in conjunction with the added features as discussed herein.

The embodiments of the online store of the present disclosure advantageously improve upon on an accuracy, reliability, and overall quality of an online buying experience through an enhanced online commerce application speciﬁc to the ordering of custom—conﬁgu1-ed computer systems, including personal computer systems. The embodiments of the online store are optimized for responsiveness (availability and speed) to customer requests and for completeness in servicing of customer demand for personal computer related information.

Brief Qescription of the Drawings The foregoing and other teachings and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent upon a detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention as rendered below. In the description to follow, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG. 1 illustrates an overview block diagram representation of the on-line store according to the present disclosure; FIG. 2 illustrates access to the on-line store via the Internet using a-computer system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 3, including 8A, 3B, and 3C, illustrate an exemplary page of the on-line store including various features of the customer conﬁgured machine method and system apparatus of the present disclosure; FIG. 4 is illustrative of a portion of an exemplary page of the on—line store including a long lead time Warning of the customer conﬁgured machine method and system apparatus of the present disclosure; FIG. 5 illustrates a portion of an exemplary page including an alternate presentation View of a conﬁguration screen of the on-line store, the alternate presentation View including all system options; FIG. 6 illustrates a page of a shopping cart of the on—line store according to an embodiment of the customer conﬁgured machine method and system apparatus of the present disclosure; FIG. 7 shows a portion of a checkout page of the on-line store according to one embodiment of the customer conﬁgured machine method and system apparatus of the present disclosure; .

FIG. 8 shows a portion of a checkout page of the on-line store according to another embodiment of the customer conﬁgured machine method and system apparatus of the present disclosure; FIG. 9 shows another portion of the checkout page of FIG. 8; FIG. 10 shows yet another portion of the checkout page of FIG. 8; and FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an exemplary personal computer system.

Cross-Reference to Co-Qending Application This application relates to co-pending United States Patent Application Serial No. 09/009,401, ﬁled on January 19, 1998, entitled “Method and Apparatus For Providing And Accessing Data At An Internet Site”, naming Amy Van Wyngarden as inventor. The co-pending application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and is assigned to the assignee of the present invention- Detailed Qescriptign of the Preferred Embodiment In conjunction with the present embodiments, an on-Line store is one component of an Internet website for which a customer may go to conﬁgure a_ particular computer system, for example, according to desired options of the customer. The on-line store is typically a subset of a larger Internet website. At the on-line store, a customer can select one or more products that the customer is interested in. Upon selection of a particular product, the on—l.ine store presents the customer with the ability for the customer to go to the product information for the particular product, customize the product, price the customized product, purchase the product, and other actions as discussed herein. While shopping happens in the website (i.e., selection of a particular kind of system (chassis) by a customer), when the customer is ready to purchase a customized system. the customer is then directed (invisibly) to that part of the Website which the on—l.ine store application controls.

Referring now to FIG. 1, the present implementation of an online store 10 for use in generating customer conﬁgured machines, i.e., customer conﬁgured computer systems, will be discussed herein below. The online store 10 includes a welcome or introductory module 12, a commerce application module 14, and a thank you module 16 (i.e., appreciation for your order). The present embodiments further include an enhanced online store user interface which advantageously enables the system conﬁguration, pricing, and ordering of a computer system via the Internet. The commerce application 14 includes a conﬁgurator 18, shopping cart 20, checkout Z2, and database 24. The database 24 provides information to the ,conﬁgurat.or 18, shopping cart 20, and checkout 22, as illustrated by arrows 26. The conﬁgm-ator 18 includes a pricing module 28, a view module 30, a lead time warning module 32, a validation (or compatibility) warning module 34, and a merchandising module 36.

The various modules of the conﬁgurator 18 are being driven by data from the database 24, as further discussed herein below.

The onljne store 10 includes welcome page 12, conﬁgurator page 18, cart 20, checkout 22, and thank you page 16. The welcome page 12 includes a static page and generally resides outside of the commerce application 14. The conﬁgurator, cart, and checkout are within the commerce application and are prone to be driven off the database, thus the conﬁgurator, shopping cart, and checkout are each linked to the database as illustrated in FIG. 1. The cart includes a cart merchandising message feature which is driven oﬁ‘ of the database. Sﬁll further, the checkout includes a payment feature, delivery feature, personal verses business feature, and instructional ext features (i.e., how to 5.11 out an online form).

The welcome page 12 is typically an introductory page and includes a link into the online store 10- The welcome page is typically a static welcome page. The online store 10 includes a smart process for the conﬁgurator 18, cart 20, and checkout 22 which are all driven by the database 24. Upon completion of a checkout, a customer would be linked to a static thank you page 16. The thank you page 16 provides a message of gratitude to the customer for having placed the order or for visiting the online store.

As discussed herein, the online store of the present disclosure includes a smart process. The degree of smartness of the present online store is greater than that of a prior online store, wherein a level of smartness in the prior online store was focused on the conﬁgurator. The couﬁgurator of the prior online store would present to the user the system selected off ﬁ'om the welcome page and include all available options.

The smartness of the pnor online store was in describing the choices for the system which the customer had selected. The present online store takes into account that some choices are not as right as others. Thus the conﬁgurator of the present online store has been made starter. A level of smartness hasalso been added to the shopping cart and the checkout, where such a level of smartness did not exist previously. Thus the smartness of the conﬁgurator has been improved and smartness has been added to the cart and checkout. Programming code for executing the improved smartness and the added smartness can be included in a separate programming module or software package or can be integral with the online store commerce application. The database and the online commerce application that drives the database make up the online store. The database can be included Within the commerce application of the online store, also. Programrning code and the functions as described herein may be implemented using programming techniques well known in the art.

Referring once again to FIG. 1, aspects of the conﬁgurator 18 which are being driven by the database 24 are illustrated. In essence, the entire conﬁgurator 18 is being driven by the database. As mentioned, the configurator 18, shopping cart 20, and checkout 22 are each part of the commerce application 14 and prone to be driven by the database 24. For example, with the shopping cart 20, there can be provided additional merchandising information coupled with a particular system which has been conﬁgured and placed in the shopping cart by an online store customer, as will be discussed further herein below.

Turning now to FIG. 2, a customer can access the online store 10 using any suitable computer equipment 40, via the Internet 42. The computer equipment 40 may include a display 42, computer 44, keyboard 46, and pointing device 48. Display 42 is used for displaying the various pages of the online store while a customer is using the online store.

Referiing brieﬂy to FIG. 11, a system block diagram of a computer system 50 is shown having features thereof conﬁgured in accordance with the online store 10 as discussed herein. The computer system 50 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 52, input/output (I/O) devices, such as a display, a keyboard, a mouse, and associated controllers, collectively designated by a reference numeral 54, a hard disk and drive 56, and other storage devices, such as a ﬂoppy disk and drive and other memory devices, collectively designated by a reference numeral 58, and various other subsystems, collectively designated by a reference numeral 60, all interconnected via one or more buses, shown collectively in FIG. 11 as a bus 62.

Turning now to FIG. 3 (3A, 3B, and 3C), from a system conﬁguration options screen 70, a customer of the onljne store 10 can build a customer conﬁgured machine by selecting from options listed on the conﬁguration screen 70. The pricing option module 28 includes an update price function. The update price function causes the price displayed on the conﬁguration screen to reﬂect any changes made to the system options. Selection of the update price function can be accomplished by clicking on an “UPDATE PRICE” icon 7 2 on the conﬁguration screen. Upon obtaining a desired conﬁguration, a customer could then select the “ADD TO CART” icon 74 to add the conﬁgured system to the shopping cart 20 and continue shopping, as desired.

The present online store application and system provide an on-line store application which includes conﬁguration, pricing, validation, shipment delay indication, and merchandising modules. The validation module provides validation of some form with respect to the customer built conﬁguration. The shipment delay indicator provides the customer with any lead time warnings or shipment delays which would occur as a result of the selection of speciﬁc options. In addition, the merchandising module provides messaging, alternatively referred to herein as merchandising information or messaging, of options recommended to be selected in a particular conﬁguration, including, for example, which options may be better than others.

With respect to the lead time or shipment delay module 32, a long lead time warning is provided with the use of a warning icon- In one embodiment, the long lead time warning icon 80 is in the form of a yellow exclamation mark, for example, as shown in FIG. 4. The Warning icon is presented to the online shopper upon the selection of a system option that has been identiﬁed as having a signiﬁcant impact on the time to delivery of the system of interest. The Warning icon and associated messaging are made present in the conﬁgurator once an update/refresh of the web. page has been requested, for example, through cliclcing on any of a number of store navigation or action buttons. The presentation of the Warning is in two parts. A ﬁrst part includes a general alert 80 to the presence of any number of potentially problematic options, the general alert being displayed on the web page, for example near the top of the page. Secondly, a long lead timeicon 82 is displayed adjacent to each long lead time option’s position in the conﬁgurator. Options are manually identiﬁed as worthy of a long lead time warning via entry of a ﬂag in an item master record of the store product database 24. Online shoppers can click on the Warning icon and receive a manually-maintained listing of all items currently marked as signiﬁcantly extending system delivery with an estimated time to delivery.

Further with respect to the lead time delay or shipment delay indication module, a lead time delay indicator provides the customer with an indication that a particular chosen option and/or combination of options will result in a shipment delay, and may further include an indication of a certain amount of time for a delay.

In other words, the shipment delay indicator provides the customer with advance notice that a parﬁcular selected option or options will result in a shipment delay. For example, a shipment delivery may be adversely affected in that the lead time or shipment is delayed ﬁom a one week build and delivery to five weeks.

The shipment or lead time delay indicator of the present embodiment advantageously provides an advance or early indication to the customer of a potential shipment delay which could occur as a result of having selected a particular option.

The customer thus does not have to wait until after having submitted the order, but rather can ﬁnd out about any shipment delays as the customer is conﬁguring andfor building his particular computer system online. The shipment or lead time delay indicator is preferably a dynamic indicator.

In connection with another enhancement to.‘ the on—line store application, merchandising recommendations are provided to the customer during the customer's’ custom building of a particular system. A merchandising recommendations module 36 enables point-of-sale merchandising, to include the providing of merchandising messaging. Merchandising messaging 76 may comprise, for example, generic text about a particular product, feature, andlor option (FIG. 3). The merchandising recommendations module is an information type delivery module for delivering messages to one or more positions within a page of the on-line store application. The merchandising recommendations module may also enable speciﬁc messaging to be called in response to the particular choices being made by the customer during the conﬁguring of a custom computer system. The on-Line store application thus can include merchandising messaging, as well as warning messages (i.e. from the validation module).

Merchandising module 36 includes merchandising messaging 7 9, option recommendations 75, and option details 76. Still referring to FIG. 3, option recommendations 75 provide for the display of a text message for the express purpose of recommending an option selection 77 at each option selection point within the conﬁgurator. Additional usage to further educate or assist customer selection of valid system options was also recognized. Option recommendation/text messaging are obtained from entries in the store produce database 24. Option details 76 provide an ability to link from the conﬁgurator to more speciﬁc detailed information about the system selection options presented. Links are made possible at each point where a system option selection was possible to aid in the choosing of the correct option from displayed alternatives. The presence of a linl-2 is triggered by the entry of a web page location (i.e., URL) for the page containing the detailed information in the store product database 24.

The on—l.ine store further includes validation of a conﬁguration built by a customer. Validation (or compatibility) provides the customer with a validation‘ message indicating an occurrence of when the options selected for a particular system we not correct. If the options selected for a particular system will adversely affect the shipment of the conﬁgured system, then the a warning message is issued to enable the user to modify options accordingly. In other words, the validation enhancement lets the customer know when one or more options are not compatible for one reason or another. The validation enhancement includes built-in logic which checks the particular conﬁguration built by the customer and indicates whether or not the selected options can be built together for the particular conﬁguration. If two or more options are incompatible, then in one embodiment, the validation enhancement returns a message indicating that the options are incompatible, as further discussed herein.

With respect to validation 34, a system option compatibility warning is issued, similar to the long lead time warning. The system option compatibility warning includes an icon, for example, in the form of a green check mark as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. The system option compatibility warning icon is presented to the online shopper when a system option identiﬁed as having an incompatibility with another system option is recognized as a customer selection. Again, the Warning icon and associated messaging are made present in the conﬁgurator once an update/refresh of the web page has been requested, for example, through the clicking on any of a number of store navigation or action buttons. The presentation of the warning is in two parts. First, a general alert 84 to the presence of any number of potentially problematic system options is displayed on the web page, for example, near the top of the page. Secondly, an option compatibility icon 86 is displayed adjacent to each potentially incompatible option’s position in the con.ﬁg'u.rator. Unlike the long lead time Warning, the option compatibility warning is accompanied by a text message explaining the possible incompatibility. According to one embodiment, the presence‘ of a warning only indicates the potential for incompatibility to exist and does not mean that one has been programmatically identiﬁed. Options are manually identiﬁed as having a potential incompatibility with other system options via entry of the warning text in the store product database 24.

Validation preferably includes a cross-checking of a combination of options.

The cross-checking determines whether or not the particular combination of options can be physically built. For instance, a product group may indicate that certain things cannot ﬁt or that the selected motherboard will only allow three things to be added, however, the customer has selected four things. Another example might include, a particular option requires the selection of a second option, so the additional option must be selected, otherwise the system cannot be builtior an indeﬁnite shipment delay will result.

Validation of a customer built system assists in increasing a customer order compliance on the part of the on-line store. Those orders which do not comply (i.e., orders for systems which for one reason or another cannot physically be built) are advantageously managed down to a signiﬁcantly lowered percentage of occurrences than previously achievable. Customers of the on-line store application thus receive advance warning when an option will not Work for a given conﬁguration. The customer can then modify, change, and/or delete the particular option which gave rise to the validation warning.

With respect to the present embodiments, two types of validation are contemplated. A ﬁrst type of validation is referred to as passive validation. Passive validation relates to the validation module knowing. that speciﬁc options don’t work together, and providing a validation message that speciﬁc options should not be included in the same conﬁguration. A second type of validation is referred to as active validation. Active validation is the active cross—checking of the options of a conﬁguration and indicating the occurrence of a problem when the problem is_ detected. That is, upon the detection of the speciﬁc options within the same conﬁguration, a Warning can be provided to the customer. Alternatively, upon the selection of a ﬁrst option, wherein the ﬁrst option cannot exist with a second option within the same conﬁguration, selection of the second option can be disabled. In the latter instance, one embodiment may include only those options which are compatible to the ﬁr-st option to be enabled when displayed. Additionally, messages can be displayed indicating the particular incompatibility with the second option, for example. ‘ With reference again to the conﬁgurator, the View module 30 includes an “all option” conﬁgurator view. That is, an ability to change from a standard view 70 (as shown in FIG. 3) to an “all option” view 90 (as shown in FIG. 5) is provided. I The standard view of the online conﬁgurator is where system opnons 77 are presented via “drop-down" selection boxes and only the currently selected option is displayed. The standard view is preferably the default display, i.e., displayed without a shopper action. However, selection of the standard view may be accomplished via selection of the standard view selection button 96 (FIG. 3) The “all option" conﬁgurator view is where all system selection options are shown at the same time. In the later view, selections are made via use of “radio buttons” 92. Activation of the “all option” conﬁgurator view is made by selection of the appropriate view selection button 94 (Fig. 5).

In accordance with another aspect of the online store, the shopping cart is customized with merchandising options. The cart takes on merchandising options similar to what the conﬁgurator is doing. With the customizable checkout, the online . store thus provides an end-to-and customizable store, at least to some degree- The shopping cart is the least customizable portion of the online store. The configurator is the most customizable portion of the online store. " The checkout includes a customizable portion of the online store having a level of customization in between that of the shopping cart and the conﬁgurator. The online store is thus end-to-end customizable. The welcome page may also be made customizable to a given extent, being driven by the database, also.

In connection with the shopping cart 20, custom merchandising messaging 100 is provided. Space for the display of customer-speciﬁc merchandising messaging 100 as to up-sell and cross-sell opportunities are madeiavailable in the shopping cart.

The entry of a text message in the store database 24 triggers the presentation of the merchandising or informational content on the shopping cart web page 102 as shown in FIG. 6. The cart message are preferably varied on a customer-by-customer basis, i.e., customizable by store. The shopping cart web page 102 further includes an ability for a user to edit or delete contents of the shopping cart, indicated collectively by reference numeral 104. Other options, indicated collectively by reference numeral 106 include continue shopping, save the cart, and place the order. Additional messaging, collectively referred to by reference numeral 108, is provided also.

Further with respect to the shopping cart, merchandising recommendations can be provided based upon the contents of the shopping’ cart. That is, based upon the contents of the user's shopping cart, is there something that could be recommended as an upgrade or a cross-sell. Speciﬁc to the customer, What is it that could be _a_ helpful about what to do next with respect to the customer conﬁgured machine in the shopping cart. The online store shopping cart includes providing merchandising messaging, for example, as shown in FIG. 6. Placing of the merchandizzing messaging is preferably dependent upon the contents of the shopping carts, specific to a particular user. The above has described what can be referred to as active messaging. Likewise, the messaging can also be passive messaging. Passive messaging does not look at What is in the cart, but rather, displays a message not necessarily directly connected with what is in the cart. For example, the passive messaging may include a particular message to be displayed during a particular time’ period. The messaging is thus static or passive. The shopping cart merchandising messaging presents to the user an additional eﬁbrt prior to checkout by the online store vendor to advertise merchandise or service, or further recommended items for the user to purchase. For example, add-ons to the computer system, extended warranty service, soﬁrware, hardware, printers or other devices, may be advertized.

The shopping cart is thus database driven. Merchandizing recommendations are provided from the database into the shopping cart. As discussed, once a desired system is conﬁgured by a customer, the conﬁgured system can then be added to the shopping cart.

Cat content screening is another feature of the online store according to the present disclosure. That is, the shopping cart further includes cart content screening.

Cart content screening includes an ability to identify when illogical/invalid combinations of systems (i.e., ones being offered by two different business segments) is attempted to be placed in the same shopping cart. The can content screening restrict such a situation from occurring. Appropriate logic is included into the commerce application to screen for combinations of systems attempting to be placed the shopping cart that would be incompatible for business reasons.

With respect to cart content screening, the online store vendor, cannot checkout a customer as a somebody until the online store knows who to treat the customer as.

The items in the cart determine who the customer is. For example, a customer may purchasefrom the federal government store, referred to as a G.S.A_ contract. A customer may also be able to purchase ﬁ'om retail, corresponding to the online‘ store unlimited. That is an allowable combination since a federal customer can purchase oﬁ contract and on contract. What is an illogical combination is for a GSA. customer to have a first discounted pricing and also for that customer to go to a corporate business store where a diﬁerent discounted pricing is applied The presence of items. in the cart with pricing from two diﬁerent discounted pricing lists, then the online store would not know who the customer is. A customer cannot be both a discounted customer A and a discounted customer B, but rather one or the other. Thus, the cart content screen prevents a customer ﬁ'om proceeding to checkout until the customer removes one of the conflicting discounted items.

As discussed, the shopping cart is based upon an identiﬁcation of a user as belonging to a particular customer set. A user is not limited as to how the user can get into the online store. A user can place an item into the cart, back out of the store, re-enter and place another item in the cart, since the cart is controlled by a session.

It is possible then that a user could have selected two or three items ﬁom diﬁerent -13. stores. Items can thus be grouped, for example, as being from a specialty store and a non-specialty store. A customer, however, may not have items taken from two specialty stores within the cart at one time for the following reason. Processing items from two different specialty stores in one cart is illogical to the online store. The online store is not set up to recognize a customer as anything but one of those special customers in such an instance. The checkout cannot determine who the customer is when items from more that one specialty store are in the cart. If only items from the federal specialty store are leﬁ: in the cart to check-out, then the process can proceed to checkout. The user is notiﬁed that a conflict exists. The government page is public knowledge. Cart content screening is useful in preparation for checkout.

Customized checkout can only be presented to an identiﬁed customer, wherein the screening is done to identify the customer. Non-logical orders (i.e., containing items from two specialty stores) are prevented ﬁ'om reaching checkout, since the non-logical orders are incompatible for business reasons (e.g., different pricing).

Referring now to FIGs. 7-10, checkout will now be discussed in greater detail.

According to the online store of the present disclosure, a custom checkout page content is provided. Checkout 22 includes an ability to dynamically generate. customer-speciﬁc variations of a standard online store checkout form. The delivery and payment options of the checkout display Web page 110 are controlled via the store database 24. Additionally, the routing of online submitted customer orders is controlled via display of recognized customer classiﬁcations (e.g., small business, federal government) dictated by store database, 24 entries. Lastly, custom emlanations of checkout requirements and checkout instructions are enabled through the support of three separate, databaserdxiven text messaging sections. This combination allows for the creation of a checkout form that best ﬁts the data gathering and information delivery requirements for speciﬁc customers. The checkout web page include identiﬁcation input 112, who will own the items ordered , type of business or organization 116, Where the order is to be shipped 118, how the order is to be shipped 120, and lastly billing and payment information, 122 and 124, respectively.

In addition, checkout according to the present embodiments is now customizable by store, whereas, in contrast, checkout in a prior online store included a static form. In other words, the checkout page or display of the present embodiments is reflective of a customer selected payment option selected by the ‘customer. For instance, if a customer desires to purchase a customer-conﬁgured computer system using a credit card, then the checkout displays a form required for the inputting of the customers credit card information only. No other details are displayed, such as, personal lease payment information or other types of payment options. As a result, the customer is not subject to being confused by unnecessary information. The credit card option page is speciﬁc to obtaining the customer's credit card information. In the past, a customer would be presented with an all—in—one form, the customer having to complete the al.l~in-one form having multiple inputs, information, and text messaging for multiple payment options which further tended to confuse a customer. With the all-in-one form, a customer could easily become‘ confused by text messaging or compliance with instructions for ﬁlling out the fonn, etc..

Knowing the store which the customer is in, the on-line store presents a checkout appropriate to the store. For instance, a customer is in the business online store, the checkout would not display or present personal lease option plans and personal lease data input, but would rather present business lease information and request business lease input. The checkout thus advantageously presents only that information and requested input which is relevant to the particular store which the customer is in. The checkout does not ask questions which are not relevant to a particular customer.

If the online store determines that a customer is a home consumer purchasing a computer system for hornelpersonal use, then checkout advantageously avoids presenting information which is unrelated to a home consumer purchasing a computer system for home/personal use. For example, the checkout would not ask for a company name or an organization name. In addition, the checkout would further not ask about payment options such as a business lease. All payments options not directly related to the particular store which the customer is in would not be presented to the given customer. The checkout feature according to the present disclosure screens out unrelated checkout options, that is, those options unrelated to a particular customer or customer set.

With respect to checkout, each time checkout was needed to be customized in the creation of a new store for a prior online store, a new object or checkout page would be required to be created. That made it less scalable to ramp from one customer set to .10 customer sets, for example. In addition, that also meant going back to the software developers and reinventing an element of the store each time that there was a need to expand the customer set. Such a prior method was ineﬁicient.

The checkout is now database driven. Scaling is built in. That is, if another customer set is needed to be added to the online store, common elements are deﬁned which deﬁne how the new customer set is to be diﬁerent from a previous deﬁned customer checkout, allow that application to build a customer set checkout on the fly, a developer would not be involved. A tool set is provided for generating a customizable checkout to meet many customer’s needs.

Further with respect to checkout, checkout of the present online store includes customizable features in contrast to a one-size-ﬁts—all checkout of a prior online store.

For example, for checkout, an at»home buyer will not have to discern or be subjected to any business‘ lease information or input. Such business lease information or input acts as a disincentive upon the at—home purchaser and detracts from the at-home buying experience of the at—home online buyer. The at-home online buyer does not typicallv Want to read through terms and conditions of a business lease. Those things that would be considered a disincentive for a given customer set are now advantageously removed from the online store of the particular customer set.

Delivery options and payment options are also customizable. One of the underlying principles is recognition of businessivverses personal store. A store can be identiﬁed as business (i.e. , for business customers exclusively) or personal (i.e. , for personal users only). In this manner there has been built in the ability to customize the checkout, so that the checkout can recognize, everywhere possib1e,the’ way to get those unrelated user aspects of the checkout away from the selected customer sets.

For example, a business customer would not be met with the personal lease payments options and then have to avoid it, or click on it indirectly. Likewise, and more importantly, for personal users, the checkout avoids asking the personal user for a company name. In other words, the online store checkout does not ask the personal user for a company name, thus avoiding confusing the customer who might otherwise think that he or she does not have the right checkout form to complete. If the customer is confused, then the customer may decide to exit the online store and pick‘ up the telephone to place an order rather than online. As a result, efﬁciencies would be lost when the sale is not placed online. The present online store advantageously maintains those eﬁciencies which are gained by placing customer orders online.

In places where there ezdsted a possibility for confusion between personal versus business, the online store advantageously includes a customization to minimize anysuch confusion. That is, the online store avoids things which could confuse customers, especially personal customers. For instance, payment options, delivery options, and messages to customers for instructions in completing online -22. forms, for example, are built in to be customizable, according to the given customer set.

Another element of the online store includes, for a business customer, the inquiry of what type of business is the customer in, so that the customer may be appropriately routed to a proper handling sales force, subsequent to an online purchase, in the event that further assistance is required. A personal customer does not need to be met with a page asking what type of business the customer is in. Such a message, in the later instance, would tend to be confusing and alienating to the personal customer. In a personal online store, those business type questions are not asked according to the customization built into checkout in conjunction with the method and apparatus of the present disclosure.

That which is deﬁned per checkout in the database is part of the customizable elements of a checkout. The elements include what departments of the online store vendor can be oﬁered for a checkout. If, for example, a business online store may recognize three types of businesses, small, medium, and large. Employee size designations can be used for how the online store {wants a business customer to define itself. Under 2,000 employees can be considered a small business. The online store. includes an ability to create a business store where those three business types/sizes are each deﬁned as an allowable option for a given store.

In accordance with the online store of the present disclosure, upon a recognition of who a particular customer is (e.g., or in what customer set), the online store takes out the unrelated options and departments, and does not present them to the customer as options for the customer. The checkout for a given customer is deﬁned as having only those valid options for who the online store knows the customer to be. For example, with respect to a federal government customer, if the federal government customer is identiﬁed as federal government, then there would be no relevant department choice. That choice is advantageously taken out of checkout for the federal government customer. The one department was recognized in the checkout logic as being: "if there is only one department, then do not present." That is, if a given checkout is deﬁned as having only one valid department, then when the customer gets to checkout, the code for the online store and commerce application is written such that the one department would not present a choice of departments. Only when there are multiple departments and selections would the same be presented at the checkout. That is one aspect of customized checkout which is built into the present online store according to the present disclosure.

Information which is not relevant to a given customer (that is,,the information does not make sense for that given customer) is not presented to that customer based upon the online store's understanding of who the customer is. In other words, based upon the online store's understanding of who the customer is, this would not make sense to you, it would only add confusion, or time and inconvenience. The online store thus has a built-in ability to make the checkout as customizable as possible, for each of the customer sets.

Additional messaging recommendations may be added to the checkout page to assist a user in the checkout process. For example, the messaging may include instructions for completing a particular section of the checkout page- Similarly, other messaging may be included, e.g., with respect to shippingldelivery. The messaging is database driven based upon the customer set of the user. Such messaging can be kept to a minimum to facilitate an ease of use by the user.

In operation, the online store includes an ability to recognize which customer set that a customer who accesses the online store is in, i.e., upon accessing the welcome page of the online store. Upon a recognition of the customer belonging to a particular customer set, the customer gets a store speciﬁc to the given customer.

Customer set refers to a_pa.rticula.r company, organization, or individual, thus there can be many customer sets. Part of the store difference is that the conﬁgurator determines what part of the online store does the customer get to see. The welcome The conﬁgurator determines which options the customer is allowed to look at within a page deﬁnes what products does the store allow the customer to see. given system (as chosen per the welcome page), merchandising options, what are allowed options, etc..

A customer is identiﬁed as ‘being in a particular customer set according to what link the customer executed to get to the online store. That is, the link includes an embedded identiﬁer which informs the online store which customer set‘ that the customer is in. For example, a federal government customer would have clicked through the website at httpu’/www.dell.com and eventually come to the federal site.

The federal site contains federal speciﬁc information. Somewhere on the federal site page, the federal business segment of the online store vendor has said that when a customer goes to the store, the online store offers the customer an option to go to the federal site. A link is embedded for proceeding to the federal site, wherein the online store then acts to treat this customer as a federal customer because the customer came and read the federal site page content, and thus they have identiﬁed themselves as a federal customer.

Premier pages is an example of a particular type of customer set in which discount pricing is private and the information is password protected. The page that has the link to the store is password protected- The general model is that if you can get to a page that has a link to the store in it, then a customer is recognized as being in a particular customer group based upon the linlcused to access the online store.

Customer sets may include individual customers, businesses, organizations, federal government, etc.. Each customer set will see a version of the online store speciﬁc to the respective customer set. The underlying elements of the online store however remain the same. Upon identiﬁcation of the customer set of a given customer, the online store operates_l_)ased upon the prescribed customer set of the given customer.

The presentation of the online store, to each customer set will thus be different for each. For the long lead time warning in the conﬁgurator, an option can be set in the online store to activate long lead time warnings for a given customer set, For example, home consumers are more sensitive to the fact that the home consumer may not wish to wait more than a normal lead times. A typical advertised lead time for the online store is $3; the order of one to two Weeks. Such a home consumer would advantageously beneﬁt from a long lead time warning. For example, the home ‘consumer can modify the order as appropriate if the lead time of the customer conﬁgured computer system is not acceptable for the customers particular requirements.

If any item has a lead time over three weeks, then lead time ﬂags would be set Within the online store to three weeks or higher. Thus any options with lead times of three weeks or higher would show up as "flags" (e.g., to display long lead time warning). Whereas, in a business customer set online store, the business customer may wait three weeks, but not six weeks, for the receipt of an order. Thus, an option having a long lead time of six weeks would show up as " ﬂag". In other words, the ﬂag is set to six weeks for the business customer set online store. It is important to. understand that difference. The underlying feature here is that a flag is being set to indicate that the selection of a particular option will result in a lead time greater than a normal lead time, according to a particular customer set.

One difference between a compatibility warning (green check mark) and a long lead time warning (yellow exclamation mark) is that the option compatibility warning preferably provides an option compatibility Warning message that is not generic. In other Words, the option compatibility warning is preferably speciﬁc to the option or options which the user has selected. The long lead time Warning indicates that there is an option on a long lead time. The long lead time warning preferably includes an icon and a message at a general level (e.g., "there are four warnings below") at a -25. prominent location of the web page. A user would then scroll down the web page to ﬁnd out which of the selections have long lead time warnings. For each option with a long lead time icon, the icon may be accompanied with a warning message that is speciﬁc to that option.

Compatibility warning carries a message with the Warning and may include, for example, "there is a potential problem with your option selection." The choice of operating system is incompatible with the hard drive, etc.. The compatibility icon is accompanied with a compatibility message which is speciﬁc to the particular option.

Everything in the conﬁgurator is speciﬁc to a given computer system (ie, chassis) per customer or per set of customers. The welcome page is"ge'a’red towards identifying a chassis. Given the chassis, the configurator displays the universe or possible options within that chassis, for a given customer set. Messaging has now been included in that option universe to assist a user in choosing a best selection for that user. If a user decides upon a different chassis, the user must return to the welcome page and select another chassis. The options Within the configurator are dependent upon the chassis. If a user wants to go to a different universe, then the user must exit the conﬁgurator, go back to the welcome page, and select a new universe (i.e., a different chassis). Recommendations can include lead time warnings, as well as compatibility warnings.

Merchandising is another feature of the online store. Merchandising is provided to better emulate what a sales representative would do if a customer telephones the online store vendor to inquire about a computer system, wherein the online store merchandising provides a potential to sell a customer a richer computer system. The merchandising of the online store better emulates a selling and cross- selling merchandising that a sales representative could perform. For example, merchandising may include up selling an extended service warranty, up selling more RAIVI, or a bigger hard drive or greater memory capacity. That is where merchandising messaging was built into the online store. The presence of the merchandising messaging at the point of sale is an improvement. The point of sale for the online store preferably includes the conﬁgurator and the cart.

The online store of the present disclosure advantageously includes a feature set which has been added to the configurator and to the cart. The present online store has also been advantageously upgraded from a reliability, performance, and maintenance standpoint. In addition, the present online store includes improvements which make it as robust as possible. Lastly, merchandising as discussed has been made to be customizable. The checkout also includes customizable features in contrast to a one-size-fits-all checkout of a prior online store. The online’ store of the present disclosure has been expanded to be a custom store customizable "for every customer set.

The conﬁgurator now includes four new features, or added elements to the presentation of the standard store. The cart includes a new feature. The checkout has new customization features. Every version of the online store includes an abilitxy to change such things as necessary for a given customer set (e.g., long lead time flags). The added elements of the present disclosure are thus all customizable by. store per given customer set.

End-to-end, the online store experience is advantageously improved. The online store has been presented from a database standpoint, its customization, and the making of the online store customizable, at least as much as to the extent of the features described herein. The online store is driven by the database in accordance with who the customer has been identiﬁed to be, as per the online store.

The online store and user interface of the present disclosure advantageously overcome deﬁciencies in the prior online store. That is, the prior online store was not as customizable as described herein with respect to the present online store. The focus of the prior online store was: "Do I have t_he right products at the right pricing?" Once the system has been selected in the prior online store, the checkout was the same for all customers. There was no customization on the back end of the prior online store. Furthermore, there was also some compromise on what the conﬁgurator did in the prior online store. _The online store and user interface of the present disclosure have expanded customization aspects of the store application, from the conﬁgurator to the checkout.

The present online store and user interface have further improved upon what the ‘conﬁgurator can deliver as a service, i.e., what the conﬁgurator can deliver as a feature set. Overall, the method and apparatus of the present disclosure provides an improved online store. Furthermore, an online store for use in the procurement of a customer conﬁgured computer system having a user interface has been described herein.

The online store includes a single online store which generates a given view for a particular customer set, which can be further customizable per customer. The online store, however, has the appearance of many different stores to many diﬁerent customers. In essence, its the same core online store, however, it is customizable for each customer, further being database driven. Customization of the online store has thus been advantageously improved, in conjunction with the added features as discussed herein.

The embodiments of the online store of the present disclosure advantageously improve upon on an accuracy, reliability, and overall quality of an online buying experience through an enhanced online commerce application speciﬁc to the ordering of custom~conﬁg‘u.red computer systems, including personal computer systems. The embodiments of the online store are optimized for responsiveness (availability and speed) to customer requests and for completeness in servicing of customer demand for personal computer related information. Completeness, in the later instance, is .29. measured relative to an information delivery experienced when ordering via the telephone.

While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the various embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the an that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing form the spirit and scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.

Claims

Claims:

1. A web-based online store having a user interface for enabling a custom conﬁguration of a computer system according to an identiﬁcation of a user belonging to a prescribed customer set, said online store comprising: - a conﬁgurator for conﬁguring a computer system with options selected according to a prescribed user input, the options and a respective pricing for each option being presented on a conﬁguration web page in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to a prescribed customer set; 0 a cart for temporarily storing the customer conﬁgured computer system, said cart including a cart web page; 0 a checkout for presenting payment options and for obtaining payment and delivery information, said checkout including a checkout web page; and 0 a database for dynamically supplying configuration options to said conﬁguration in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set; 0 said conﬁgurator comprising a warning indicator for indicating an option which is subject to adversely impact a shipment of the conﬁgured computer system, the warning indicator including a lead time warning in connection with an option which is subject to incurring a lengthened lead time for shipment of the conﬁgured computer system, which is greater than a prescribed lead time, the prescribed lead time being in accordance with the identification of the user belonging to a prescribed customer set.

2. The online store of gang, wherein said conﬁgurator further includes merchandising recommendations for available options and their respective option details, the merchandizing recommendations being presented on the conﬁgurator web page, and wherein said database is further for dynamically supplying the merchandising recommendations to said conﬁgurator in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

3. The online store of claim 1, wherein said cart further includes merchandising recommendations for add-on options, the merchandising recommendations being presented on the cart web page, and wherein said database is further for dynamically supplying the l0 merchandising recommendations to said cart in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

4. The online store of claim 1, wherein the payment options of said checkout are presented on the checkout web page, and wherein said database is further for dynamically supplying the payment options to said checkout in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

5. The online store of claim l, further wherein the lead time warning includes a graphic and a text message for indicating the lengthened lead time for shipment.

6. The online store of claim 5, wherein the graphic includes an exclamation mark.

7. The online store of claim 1, wherein the option which is subject to incurring a lengthened lead time for shipment is one identiﬁed as having a significant impact on the time to delivery of the configured computer system.

8. The online store of claim 1, wherein the lead time warning is made present in the contigurator upon an update/ refresh of the conﬁgurator web page.

9. The online store of claim 1, wherein the warning indicator provides a general alert to the presence of any number of potentially problematic options displayed on the conﬁgurator web page and a long lead time icon displayed adjacent to each long lead time option‘s position in the conﬁgurator web page.

10. The online store of claim 1, wherein options are manually identified as worthy of a long lead time warning via entry of a flag in an item master record in said database.

1 l. The online store of claim 9, further wherein activation of a prescribed long lead time icon by the user results in the displaying of a manually-maintained listing of all items marked as signiﬁcantly extending system delivery, in addition to a corresponding estimated time to delivery. Iv an

12. The online store of claim 1, wherein the warning indicator includes a system option compatibility warning indicator for providing a system compatibility warning upon the detection of a second option selected as per the prescribed user input which is incompatible in connection with a first option of the configured computer system.

13. The online store of claim 12, wherein the system option compatibility warning indicator includes a graphic and a text message for indicating the incompatibility of the second option with the first option.

14. The online store of claim 13, wherein the graphic includes a check mark.

15. The online store of claim 12, wherein the system option compatibility warning is made present in the configurator upon an update/ refresh of the conﬁgurator web page.

16. The online store of claim 12, wherein the system option compatibility warning indicator provides a general alert to the presence of any number of potentially problematic system compatibility options displayed on the web page and a system incompatibility icon displayed adjacent to each potentially incompatible option‘s position in the configurator web page.

17. The online store of claim 1, wherein said configurator further includes an alternate View selector for selecting between a first presentation view and a second presentation view of the coiifigurator web page, the first presentation view including drop down boxes for option selection and the second presentation View including radio buttons for use in option selection.

18. The online store of claim 3, wherein said checkout is customized according to the identification of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set, the customization including at least one of the following options selected from the group consisting of contact information. ownership information, type of business,’ organization, payment/billing options, and shipment/ delivery options.

19. The online store of claim 3, wherein said checkout further screens the cart to determine if selections in the cart are from more than one specialty store, wherein a specialty store corresponds to a customized store of said online store for a prescribed customer set. further 34 wherein a sin le user ma have accessed said online store via more than one rescribed 10 customer set.

20. The online store of claim 1, wherein said checkout presents said payment options in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set, said database for further dynamically supplying merchandising information to said cart, and payment and delivery options to said checkout, wherein the respective web pages are dynamically generated in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

21. The online store of claim 20, wherein the warning indicator further includes a system option compatibility warning indicator for providing a system compatibility warning upon the detection of a second option selected as per the prescribed user input which is incompatible in connection with a first option of the conﬁgured computer system.

22. The online store of claim 21, wherein said checkout is customized according to the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set, the customization including at least one of the following options selected from the group consisting of contact information, ownership information, type of business/organization, payment/billing options. and shipment/delivery options.

23. A method for enabling a custom conﬁguration of a computer system according to an identification of a user belonging to a prescribed customer set via a user interface of a web- based online store. said method comprising the steps of: 0 providing a configuration for conﬁguring a computer system with options selected according to a prescribed user input, the options and a respective pricing for each option being presented on a conﬁguration web page in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to a prescribed customer set; 0 providing a cart for temporarily storing the customer conﬁgured computer system. the cart including a cart web page; 0 providing a checkout for presenting payment options and for obtaining payment and delivery information, the checkout including a checkout web page; 0 providing a database for dynamically supplying conﬁguration options to the conﬁguration in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set; and 0 a warning indicator for indicating an option which is subject to adversely impact a shipment of the conﬁgured computer system, the warning indicator including a lead time warning in connection with an option which is subject to incurring a lengthened lead time for shipment of the conﬁgured computer system, which is greater than a prescribed lead time, the prescribed lead time being in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to a prescribed customer set.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the conﬁgurator further includes merchandising recommendations for available options and their respective option details, the merchandising recommendations being presented on the conﬁgurator web page, and wherein the database is further for dynamically supplying the merchandising recommendations to the conﬁgurator in accordance with the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein the cart further includes merchandising recommendations for add-on options, the merchandising recommendations being presented on the cart web page, and wherein the database is further for dynamically supplying the merchandising recommendations to the cart in accordance with the identification of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

26. The method of claim 23, wherein the payment options of the checkout are presented on the checkout web page, and wherein the database is further for dynamically supplying the payment options to the checkout in accordance with the identification of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set.

27. The method of claim 23, further wherein the lead time warning includes a graphic and a text message for indicating the lengthened lead time for shipment.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein the graphic includes an exclamation mark. 36

29. The method of claim 23, wherein the option which is subject to incurring a lengthened lead time for shipment is one identiﬁed as having a signiﬁcant impact on the time to deliverv of the conﬁgured computer system.

30. The method of claim 23, wherein the lead time warning is made present in the conﬁ gurator upon an update/ refresh of the conﬁgurator web page.

31. The method of claim 23, wherein the waming indicator provides a general alert to the presence of any number of potentially problematic options displayed on the conﬁgurator web page and a long lead time icon displayed adjacent to each long lead time option's position in the conﬁgurator web page.

32. The method of claim 23, wherein options are manually identiﬁed as worthy of a long lead time warning via entry of a ﬂag in an item master record in the database.

33. The method of claim 23, further wherein activation of a prescribed long lead time icon by the user results in the displaying of a manually-maintained listing of all items marked as signiﬁcantly extending system delivery, in addition to a corresponding estimated time to delivery.

34. The method of claim 23, wherein the warning indicator includes a system option compatibility warning indicator for providing a system compatibility warning upon the detection of a second option selected as per the prescribed user input which is incompatible in connection with a ﬁrst option of the conﬁgured computer system.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein the system option compatibility warning indicator includes a graphic and a text message for indicating the incompatibility of the second option with the first option.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the graphic includes a check mark.

37. The method of claim 34, wherein the system option compatibility warning is made present in the conﬁgurator upon an update/refresh of the conﬁgurator web page.

38. The method of claim 34, wherein the system option compatibility warning indicator provides a general alert to the presence of any number of potentially problematic system compatibility options displayed on the web page and a system incompatibility icon displayed adjacent to each potentially incompatible option's position in the configurator web page.

39. The method of claim 23, wherein the conﬁgurator further includes an alternate view selector for selecting between a first presentation View and a second presentation V'l6W of the configurator web page, the first presentation view including drop down boxes for option selection and the second presentation View including radio buttons for use in option selection.

40. The method of claim 25, wherein the checkout is customized according to the identiﬁcation of the user belonging to the prescribed customer set, the customization including at least one of the following options selected from the group consisting of Contact information, ownership information, type of business/organization, payment/billing options. and shipment/delivery options.

41 . The method of claim 25, wherein the checkout further screens the cart to determine if selections in the cart are from more than one specialty store, wherein a specialty store corresponds to a customized store of the online store for a prescribed customer set, further wherein a single user may have accessed the online store via more than one prescribed customer set. F