RU16967U1 - INFORMATION STUDY SYSTEM - Google Patents

Abstract

1. An information learning system comprising an input unit, an output unit, a control unit and a memory unit for communicating tasks and correct answers, characterized in that the tasks and the corresponding correct answers are combined into groups in the indicated memory unit, and the control unit is configured to select tasks from the indicated groups and upon transition to a new stage of studying the selection of tasks from the subsequent group and all or at least one or more previous ones and presenting eniya student task, and the output unit is designed to display task, the student answer a correct answer and supplied from pamyati.2 block. A system for studying information, containing an input unit, an output unit, a control unit and a memory unit designed for storing tasks and correct answers, characterized in that the system contains a unit for analyzing and evaluating the correctness of answers studying information related to information and control system buses and designed to compare the student’s answers with the corresponding correct answers stored in the memory and transmission unit to derive an assessment of the correctness of the answer for introducing the learner. 3. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the control unit is made in the form of a controller. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the unit for analyzing and evaluating the correctness of the student’s answers includes a comparison tool connected via information buses to the controller and the memory unit and designed to compare the response to the task entered by the student and correspondingly

Description

Information Learning System

The claimed system for studying information relates to the field of providing and obtaining knowledge in various fields of human activity. In particular, systems for studying information using an interactive environment, for example, a dialogue between a user and a computer, are claimed.

State of the art

A known system and method of teaching foreign languages, based on the fact that the program for training include texts in a foreign language, which are displayed on the screen with an extension of the frames. At the same time, the phrase in a foreign language corresponding to the fragment in the frame is given in the highlighted part. Translations of phrases are also shown on the display, while they are voiced; the student has the opportunity to associatively compare the drawing with the explanations of this drawing in a foreign language (WO 96/16388 A1, G 09 B 19/06, 05/30/1996).

A known method of teaching foreign languages, including determining the basic minimum of the words of the studied language based on the frequency analysis of common words, dividing the resulting minimum into groups by parts of speech, forming subgroups by subject in these groups. In the obtained subgroups, international words are distinguished that have similarities in pronunciation and meaning with the words of the learner's native language, which are emphasized in the initial stage of training, the obtained groups and subgroups are presented in the form of one or more tables (RU 2150147 C1, G 09 B 19/06 , 05.25.2000).

Known manual for learning a foreign language. The manual includes the text in the native language located on each of its pages in the traditional line-by-line order and the exact translation of this text in a foreign language, located under each line of the text in the native language, word by word after a certain interval, as well as transliteration of words in a foreign language under each word of the specified text ( RU 2146066 C1, G 09 B 19/08, 02.27.2000).

A known system for studying information stored in a database, and video equipment for training functions using the studied database

The system contains a systematized database in a certain way, video equipment that provides the process of study. The studied database includes the stages or stages of training, ranked in accordance with the frequency of use of certain data and the indicator generated during ranking, indicating a group of classified data (EP 953953 A2, G 09 B 19/06, 03.11.99).

Closest to the technical nature of the claimed system is a system for studying information, in particular foreign and native languages.

The system contains a block for inputting the learner's answers, a memory block for answering the questions of the study program, a decoder for analyzing the correctness of the answer, and a means for visualizing the correct answer. The outputs of the specified analyzer are connected to a letter-printing mechanism, with a memory block and an input of a visualization tool showing the correctness of this answer and the operating mode of the training system. A control panel is connected to another input of the visualization tool, which allows you to proceed to the task from the next exercise if the correct answer to the question from the exercise is given. The inputs of the remote control are connected to the memory of the program input device with the recording of sequentially performed algorithmic exercises. The outputs of the control panel are connected to the help information block for each question of the program, the outputs of the remote control are also connected to the response input node. The system is equipped with an additional memory unit connected in the form of an insertable cartridge (DE 2750323 A1, G 09 B 19/06, 05/18/1978).

Known systems do not provide for a change in the script depending on the degree of assimilation of a particular material, they usually change the script depending on the correctness or incorrectness of the answer.

The technical result of the claimed system is to expand the arsenal of used technical means, use computer tools to visualize user questions and answers and evaluate these answers depending on the degree of assimilation of the material being studied, and improving the quality of training.

Providing the ability to enter the learner’s answers through the keyboard of the input unit forms the learner’s stable high-speed typing skills “blindly in the studied foreign language. Improving the quality of training is also realized through the constant need in the learning process to pay close attention to spelling words, phrases, etc., which helps to increase the results in the field of literacy in foreign languages with the participation of “visual memory. For many languages, the problem of literacy is acute

/ x (a - // - / 7

present day. Memorization through fingers occurs at a reflex level, i.e. the phrase subsequently, if necessary, without any mental effort, will take its place in the student’s speech. To give full value to the sensory level of mastering the material, associative illustrations are introduced that allow you to visually feel each phrase, which compares favorably with a simple verbal analogue in your native language, the perception of the situation and when using the phrase. Phrases as grammatical constructions, remembered at a reflex level without awareness of their meaning, do not represent any value for a student even as elements of a language. Awareness comes only in the associative filling of the lexical form. In this case, another kind of memory is involved, represented by a visualization implemented as part of the corresponding abstraction of the phrase being studied. Depending on the phrase, an illustration is selected at the appropriate level of abstraction, appropriate to the concept of this phenomenon as a process. To use another kind of memory - the auditory perception of the phrase - the words are pronounced by the sound reproduction unit. It also contributes to more rapid memorization of the proposed material and the development of pronunciation. Accompanying each phrase with a video sequence with pronouncing the phrase in an emotional form as applied to a specific situation on the screen can also be provided, this is done with a sound card (sound reproduction unit) and recording the specified program in the program memory (not shown in the drawing). This factor contributes to the memorization of material at a subsensory level. At the same time, it is desirable to provide the opportunity to use the student's articulation through imitation of the characters of the video sequence, etc.

The claimed system also used a method of repeating learned texts, words, phrases at various learned stages of studying materials on the current screen being studied, which makes it possible to improve the quality of assimilation of an increasing volume of knowledge.

The system for studying information contains an input unit, an output unit, a control unit and a memory unit designed to store tasks and correct answers, the system contains an analysis and evaluation unit for the answers of those studying information related to the information and control buses of the system and designed to comparing the student’s answers with the corresponding correct answers stored in the memory and transmission unit to enter an assessment of the correctness of the answer for

acquaintance teaching information. In addition, the output unit is intended to display the task, the answer of the student and the correct answer.

The control unit may be made in the form of a controller.

The unit for analyzing and evaluating the correctness of the answers of the student includes a comparison tool connected via information buses to the controller and the memory unit and designed to compare the answer entered by the student to the task and the corresponding correct answer from the memory unit, the outputs of the comparison tool are connected to the first decoder, the group of outputs of which is connected to the second decoder, the output of which is connected via the control bus to the first input of the controller, the output of the correct response of the first decoder is connected through the control bus with the second input of the controller and the input of the counter of the number of correct answers, the output of the "wrong answer of the first decoder is connected to the counter of the number of incorrect answers, the output of which is connected via the control bus to the third input of the controller, the first output of the controller through the control bus is connected to the counter of the total number of jobs, one controller output through the corresponding information bus connected to means for counting the number of tasks without their repetitions, the output of which and the outputs of the counters of the number of correct answers, the number of incorrect of strong answers and the counter of the total number of tasks are connected to the corresponding inputs of the ALU, the output of which is connected via the control bus to the fourth input of the controller, the second output of the controller through the control bus is connected to the input of the counter of the total number of tasks. In addition, the memory block is designed to store tasks and correct answers when learning a foreign language, and the memory block is designed to store tasks and correct answers about geographical objects.

The memory block is designed to store tasks and the correct answers to traffic rules.

The memory block is designed to store tasks for the study of musical notation and the correct answers to these tasks.

The memory block is designed to store tasks and correct answers for studying the phonetics of a foreign language.

The system may comprise a display unit and / or a sound reproduction unit associated with the freezing unit and the information and control buses.

illustrating one of the criteria, providing a transition to another stage of study.

The system contains an input unit 1, connected to the control unit, for example, in the form of a controller 2, designed to control the operation of the system, the control bus of the controller through the control bus 21 of the system is connected to the control inputs of all units included in the system, the information bus 22 of the system also connects everything system blocks. The unit 3 for analyzing and evaluating the correctness of the answers is connected to the controller 2 and with the zones 4i, 42 and 4з of the memory unit 4 via the corresponding buses, the output unit 5 is connected through the controller 2 to the input unit 1, the analysis and evaluation unit for the correctness of the answer 3, with the audio playback unit 7 and a display unit 6.

The memory unit 4 may be a database, in the corresponding areas of which data is stored, ranked in a certain way, which will be discussed below.

Figure 2 presents a possible implementation of block 3 analysis and evaluation of the correctness of the answers. The block includes a comparison tool 8, a counter 9 for the number of correct answers, a counter 15 for the total number of asked questions, a counter 11 for the number of incorrect answers; the first decoder 12, the second decoder 13 and the arithmetic device 14. The comparison means 8 is connected through the controller 2 via information and control buses 22 and 21 to the input unit 2 for inputting answers by a user studying this or that information and the corresponding memory zone of unit 4 memory where the correct answers are stored. These responses come from the corresponding zone of block 4 by control signals from controller 2.

Comparison tool 8 in the simplest embodiment can be a bitwise (non-symbolic comparison) means, the information outputs of which are connected to the first decoder 12. The decoder in the simplest case can be implemented as a converter that converts the input character combination obtained by comparison into the corresponding output code. In this case, the counter of correct answers 9, the counter 11 of incorrect answers and the second decoder 13 of responses, which can be evaluated as correct, are connected to the corresponding outputs of the decoder 12. The counting input of the counter 9 is connected to the outputs of the decoder 12 and the decoder 13, the outputs of the counters 9, 10 and 11 are connected to the corresponding inputs of the arithmetic-logical device 14. The outputs of the ALU 14 are connected to the controller 2. The system operates as follows.

Consider an example implementation of a system for studying information in which the information is a foreign language. The information that is studied in a foreign language is a lexical material formed in the form of words and / or phrases in a foreign language, intended for memorization during the study. Words and phrases are combinations aimed at memorizing both new words (verbal forms) to be studied and the lexical constructions themselves, formed by a combination of primitive lexical units (words). By studying the construction itself, it is meant to understand the principle of the formation of a given lexical combination (for example, phrases or phrases), it means understanding the conjugation forms of verbs, declension of nouns, the correct use of conjunctions and prepositions, etc.

The recommended form of study can be one that includes the volume of phrases to be mastered and consisting of 3 to 5 new words. The remaining words should already be familiar to the student. In this case, new words are remembered, the forms of their use, their declination, conjugation, cases of correct use, the meaning of words in certain cases, etc.

The volume of phrases subject to one-time assimilation, and the saturation of a new, currently unknown to the student lexical base, is selected based on the abilities of a particular individual or other practice.

So, a certain array of phrases and phrases (possibly words or other constructions) is to be studied, consisting, on the one hand, of lexical constructions in one language, and on the other hand, of the corresponding (similar) lexical constructions in another language. One of the languages is being studied. Next is the native language and the language being studied. The indicated material for study is given in table 1, in which the questions in one language are shown on the right side of the line, and the answers in the foreign language are in the corresponding line on the left side.

Table 1

with this in mind, they form in the database (memory block 4) zones of groups of tasks (questions), which are words or phrases in the native language and the corresponding zones of the groups of correct answers in the foreign language. Groups of questions (words and / or phrases) can be formed according to different criteria, for example, the first group is just words, the second group is the simplest phrases from them, etc.

The following is table 2, which presents one of the possible examples of representing lexical material in the form of groups. Moreover, in the rows on the right side of Table 2 are groups of questions (tasks) in one language (native) and in the corresponding rows on the left, answers in a foreign (English) language, in database 4, for example, in the 1st (odd) zone (first group) questions are stored under the corresponding addresses in one language, and in the 2nd (even) zone (second memory group) with the corresponding addresses are the correct answers in a foreign language. In subsequent zones, for example, in odd ones - questions, in even answers, similarly store the following group of questions (tasks) and answers, etc.

Below is an example of partitioning an array into groups, for example, a group with the word “occur, a group with the word“ sufficient, a group with the word “preconceived, a group with the word“ emphasize. It is possible to split the array according to other characteristics. Suppose the first group of phrases contains simpler phrases (shorter, possibly), the next group is more complex, and the last group contains complex phrases with the original use of this word.

table 2

Thus, in block 4 (database), questions and answers are stored in groups, i.e. The information presented in the form described above, which must be studied.

The system starts with the fact that the student is shown on the display (display unit 6) the first group of words and / or phrases that needs to be studied. It can be displayed on the display screen, for example, in the form as the first group is presented in table 2: on the left side there are correct answers in a foreign language, on the right side questions in a native language. Those. a procedure may be provided for the student to familiarize himself with the lexical material. Then begins the process of study (training)

The controller displays the word or phrase from the first group of questions and answers in the native language through the controller 2 from the base 4i, the student is offered, for example, accompanying this word or phrase with the text: “enter the word or phrase in a foreign language from the keyboard (block 1 input) your version of the answer in a foreign language. Together with the question, this answer is displayed. Then the controller displays on the screen from zone 42 (correct answers) the correct answer to the asked question in a foreign language. The correct answer can also be spoken out by the sound reproducing unit 7, which is also controlled by the controller 2. It can also be accompanied by a visual range displayed on the screen. Thus, the trainee has the opportunity to compare his answer with the correct answer and try to remember the question and the correct answer again and the associated sound and visual associations without knowing how his answer is evaluated by the system. This, firstly, allows the student to compare his answer and the correct one, and, therefore, to analyze both the answer and the proposed task himself. The system itself provides for the analysis and assessment of the correctness of the learner's answer, which allows changing the scenario for studying the material according to objective indicators.

the answer comes not only to the display unit 6, but also to the second group of information inputs of the comparison means 8, the outputs of which are connected to the decoder 12. The decoder, depending on the input combination corresponding to the comparison results, forms various input combinations at the output. For example, in the case of a correct answer, a signal is generated at the output of the corresponding bit of the decoder, which is fed to the counting input of the counter 9 of the number of correct answers, and from it to the ALU 14, as well as to the controller for transmission to the display to inform the student.

In case of an incorrect answer, the signal from the corresponding bit of the decoder 12 enters the counter 11 of the number of incorrect answers, which can be reversed, i.e. have two inputs: one is a summing input, the other is subtracting. The output of the counter 11 is also connected to the ALU 14. As indicated above, the outputs of the decoder 12 are connected to the second decoder 13, designed to decode the combinations coming from the decoder 12 and determine the combinations that can be assigned to the correct combinations. For example, the error found in the space between words, i.e. this is a data entry error, the error in an insignificant character, etc. can be considered the correct answer. If the decoder 13 detects in the incoming combination one of the combinations assigned to the correct one, it forms a unit at the output connected to the counting input of the counter 9 of the correct answers. These combinations are predefined and embedded in the logic of the decoder. The counter 9 will count the response analyzed by the decoder 13 as correct. Moreover, as was indicated, one of the combinations according to the results of the comparison will be initially counted in the counter 10 as incorrect, but after decoding by the decoder 13 for compliance with the possible correct answer and recognizing the answer as correct, the signal from the output of the decoder 13 is fed to the subtracting input of the counter 11, which considers number of incorrect answers. Moreover, the counter will exclude the indicated incorrect answer, i.e. subtract from the total number of incorrect answers. It should be said that the controller that controls the system for each group of questions proposed for study selects questions, for example, according to a random law, while it considers the number of questions asked by it, excluding the repeated number (code) of the question, i.e. he transmits through the counter 10 the number of questions proposed to the student, without repetition.

.0. / Repetitions includes a memory unit 16, a delay element 18, a comparison unit 17, the first information output of the controller 2 through an information bus is connected to one of the inputs of the comparison unit 17 and through a delay element 18 is connected to a memory unit 16, the output of which is connected to other inputs the comparison unit 17, the output of which through the element is NOT connected to the counter 10. In the memory block 16 codes of the question or number through the delay element 18 comes from the controller 2, the codes of the numbers from the controller are also transmitted to the comparison unit 17. In this case, the delay element before Classifi- cation in order to unleash the time entry code predschuschego issue and subsequent. The outputs of the memory block 16 are connected to one of the inputs of the comparison block and it receives the codes of all questions received from the controller at this stage, and the codes of the next question come to the other inputs if this code matches any of the codes of the memory block (they can come from memory block sequentially, etc.) the signal from the output of the comparison unit about the coincidence of codes is inverted by the element NOT 19 (which is the output of the indicated means) and, therefore, when the codes coincide, it is not counted by the counter 10. In case of mismatch of the codes, the counter ik 10 the number of asked questions, with the exception of repeating ones, is triggered and transfers this number to A.PU 10. Thus, the ALU 14 outputs data on the total number of questions asked, the total number of questions asked, excluding repetitions of these questions, on the number of correct answers in the group and the number of incorrect answers in the group.

The controller, as was indicated, is made in such a way that it can select the operation scenario according to the signals of the comparison results in the means 8, as well as taking into account the status of the counters 9, 10 and 11 and the signals coming from the ALU 14.

Consider the possible scenarios. If counter 9 has changed its state to one, i.e. the student’s answer was correct, then, firstly, this signal is sent to the controller, which sends a message to the display that the answer is rated as correct. The learner also sees the evaluation results on the display screen, this signal is transmitted from the controller by the signal from counter 9 or decoder 13, i.e. the learner sees that his answer is rated as correct. In addition, when receiving a signal about the correctness of the response from the counter and from the decoder 13, the controller switches to work according to the script of correct answers. In its simplest form, its program of work is as follows: it excludes from the proposed questions the one that received the correct answer, or excludes this question by several steps (steps). Those. after a few questions, he can again be included in the number of questions asked. Further, the controller in its program makes a random selection

./

the law or in any other way of the next question and further, the procedure is repeated as indicated above.

The controller provides for the operation of counting all asked questions with the exception of repetitions of these questions. This information goes to counter 10 of the total number of questions asked in the group and from it to ALU 14.

ALU 14 compares in each group of questions the number of asked questions without repeated questions with the number of correct answers in the group and, if the number of correct answers of a certain value is exceeded, generates a signal corresponding to the assessment of the positive development of the material and the transition to the next stage of studying the material, i.e. with the addition of questions from the second group.

The algorithms for evaluating the development of the material can be different, for example, in practice, the dependence of the transition to the next stage of using the next graph (fieg.Z) is obtained, where r is the percentage of correct answers on the number of asked questions without repetition, and j is the number of asked questions without repetition. Using this criterion, ALU 14 calculates the value of g, compares it with the value of j, and proceeds to the next stage based on the results of the comparison.

In the case of the transition to the next stage, the controller offers the student questions of a new group and questions of all the previous ones according to the procedure described above as questions. This allows not only mastering new material, but also repeating what has been learned in previous groups.

If the student incorrectly answered the question proposed by the system, the controller, having received a signal from decoder 12 about this, again asks the student the same question. In this case, the system can operate according to a simple scenario, i.e. until the student learns this question and answers it correctly, proposes this question again, the controller can also, after a certain number of incorrect questions introduced by the student in a row, offer the student to relax or to enter reference material from the database related to this undeveloped question on the display screen.

The system operation procedure is as follows. Counter 11 counts constantly the number of incorrect answers and transmits to ALU 14, at the same time, the controller transmits through the counter 10 the number of asked questions without repetition, which does not change if the system asks the same question. In this case, if the number of questions from counter 10 remains constant, and the number of incorrect answers exceeds the set, ALU 14 sends a signal about this to controller 2, and he proceeds to the procedure of selecting from the database 4z additional information on the given question in accordance with the address

that question in the database. This information is offered to the student for study. After displaying this information, the system again after a certain time goes to work on asking questions, receiving answers and evaluating them.

The system can work in a similar way, for example, when studying grammatical material, when formulating affirmative, negative and interrogative forms in the present continuous tense (present continuous tense}. To implement this kind of grammatical tasks, the identical approach used in the preferred embodiment is used. an array of phrases is formed in the student’s original lexical base in present continuous, should not be set to use complex lexical forms in this case, as this will complicate the task chi development of grammatical structure, shifting priorities focus on the student's lexical subtlety phrases. These phrases have in the database in a similar way to phrase questions 4i zone, and the responses in the zone 42.

Table 3

Full similarity with the examples in table 1 and 2 is observed when studying the rules of reading. In this case, it is possible to use auditory perception instead of visual in the display output and sound reproduction units 5, 6, 7, i.e. a word (phrase) is spoken, and the student is required to enter this word (phrase) by ear from the keyboard or select from the list on the screen.

For example, the system pronounces the word “table. The student enters “table” from the keyboard or selects this option from the list on the screen, in which the provocatively incorrect option “tabl, etc., may appear; the procedure for proposing a question and answering it may change as well.

In the study of grammatical constructions (present continuous tense}, theoretical knowledge is provided for in Table 3. The development of the material in this case is aimed at the reflex application of the latter. In parallel with this, elements of the emotional-semantic approach to the study of phrases can be used, for example, phrases can be provided with relevant illustrations, audio and video tracks.

The system also provides for the involvement of the learner's logic, since a consistent structural analysis and evaluation of the proposed answer is carried out. For this purpose, as it was pointed out, a unit of analysis and assessment of the correctness of the answer is used and it evaluates the learner's response. Those. Depending on the results of the analysis and assessment, not only the learning scenario is changed, but also the learner is informed of the assessment of the development of the material. The system can train the user from scratch, i.e. from simple to complex, which makes the claimed system universal. The system, as was indicated, provides for the transition from questions to the mode of presenting the user with additional information on any of the questions asked. This information is also stored in the corresponding zone 4z of the database and can be displayed automatically after several repetitions of incorrect answers.

The user can also enter a request for additional information on issues that he wants to study more carefully. The controller accesses the corresponding memory zone using the code entered by the user. In this case, additional information is displayed, possibly in text mode. Relatively interesting or not digestible issue.

In block 3 of analysis and assessment of the correctness of the answers, the questions and answers are compared in the same way as in the first example of the system, and the evaluation of the answer is displayed.

Additional information can be presented in this way, for example, in the form of a video sequence with audio and / or alphabetic text, etc.

The claimed system can be used not only for learning foreign languages. The system allows the study of geographical maps, with fragments of the geographical map 4i being assigned to one database zone, and the name of the indicated geographical object to another zone 42.

The system can be used in the study of musical notation. In this case, the question will be asked through block 7 of sound reproduction as a kind of sound note or as a derivative of a note (flat, etc.), and the answer should be given in the form of a choice on the screen of the corresponding note with the appropriate soundtrack. Such a program has also been developed.

One possible example of using the system is to study the phonetics of the English language. Moreover, when studying the rules of reading and spelling, the system can carry out the following actions.

A word is suggested for a characteristic rule (for example, the 1st and 2nd types of stressed vowels reading) (as well as for all the material passed), and it is proposed to indicate in text form the option of correct transcription or transcription (pronouncing the word by ear) and is proposed in indicate missed letters in the test form (or type the whole word from the keyboard).

A word is displayed on the screen and it is proposed to collect the transcription of this word (or its characteristic part, depending on the level of complexity) from the set of transcription characters on the screen by dragging the latter. Each transcription mark is equipped with a hint sound when dragging. At the end of typing, a dialogue with a computer is possible. The computer asks why this word sounds exactly what rules the student was guided by collecting this particular transcription. The word is spoken. The following task is given.

Thus, reading and writing skills are formed in English, while the student can use articulation, which contributes to the additional development of this material. Articulation is carried out at the moment of dragging the transcriptional characters.

It should be noted that in the database of questions and correct answers you can enter information on almost any field of knowledge.

Claims (10)

1. An information learning system comprising an input unit, an output unit, a control unit and a memory unit for communicating tasks and correct answers, characterized in that the tasks and the corresponding correct answers are combined into groups in the indicated memory unit, and the control unit is configured to select tasks from the indicated groups and upon transition to a new stage of studying the selection of tasks from the subsequent group and all or at least one or more previous ones and presenting eniya student task, and the output unit is designed to display task, the student answer a correct answer and supplied from the storage unit.  2. A system for studying information, containing an input unit, an output unit, a control unit and a memory unit for communicating tasks and correct answers, characterized by the fact that the system contains an analysis and evaluation unit for the correct answers of a student studying information related to information and control buses of the system and designed to compare the student’s answers with the corresponding correct answers stored in the memory and transmission unit for outputting an assessment of the correctness of the answer for I review the student.  3. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the control unit is made in the form of a controller.  4. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the unit for analyzing and evaluating the correctness of the student’s answers includes a comparison tool connected via information buses to the controller and the memory unit and designed to compare the response to the task entered by the student and the corresponding correct answer from the memory unit, the outputs of the comparison tool are connected to the first decoder, the group of outputs of which is connected to the second decoder, the output of which is connected via the control bus to the first input of the controller, the output of the correct answer is first of the decoder is connected via the control bus to the second input of the controller and the input of the counter of the number of correct answers, the output of the "wrong answer" of the first decoder is connected to the counter of the number of incorrect answers, the output of which is connected via the control bus to the third input of the controller, the first output of the controller through the control bus is connected to with a counter of the total number of tasks, one controller outputs are connected via the corresponding information bus to a means for counting the number of tasks without their repetitions, the output of which and the outputs counters of the number of correct answers, the number of incorrect answers and the counter of the total number of tasks are connected to the corresponding inputs of the ALU, the output of which is connected via the control bus to the fourth input of the controller, the second output of the controller through the control bus is connected to the input of the counter of the total number of tasks.  5. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the memory unit is designed to store tasks and correct answers when learning a foreign language.  6. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the memory unit is designed to store tasks and the correct answers about geographical objects.  7. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the memory unit is designed to store tasks and the correct answers to traffic rules.  8. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the memory unit is designed to store tasks for the study of musical notation and the correct answers to these tasks.  9. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the memory unit is designed to store tasks and the correct answers for studying the phonetics of a foreign language. 10. The system according to any one of paragraphs. 2-8, characterized in that the system contains outputs associated with the unit and information and control buses display unit and / or sound playback unit.