Finally a change at Leicester but was it 'too little, too late'?published at 12:21 11 March
Chris Forryan
Fan writer


To change horses midstream means to make changes to an activity that has already started.
Finally, after weeks of screaming for it, that is exactly what Leicester got at Chelsea on Sunday.
Going into the match, I felt we might get something from a Chelsea side that were not in the best of form and whose fans were voicing public apathy towards their manager's style of play. That is something we well remember from Enzo Maresca's time last year, albeit were 17 points clear at the top and that silences a lot of criticism.
However, the shock was almost audible when the team was announced and we no longer saw the 4-2-3-1 formation that had been failing us every week under Ruud van Nistelrooy.
He had changed to a 5-2-1-2, with the back five reverting to a back three going forward and deployed wing-backs. This change, it appeared, frustrated Maresca.
We saw Jordan Ayew and Bobby DeCordova-Reid dropped, neither of whom should be starters. Luke Thomas and Conor Coady were back in defence, with the latter offering experience and leadership. And yes, two up front.
We did not win but, if the team performance against West Ham was a -10 out of 10, this was a solid seven. With rumours Van Nistelrooy had been considering this formation since he arrived, the question is why wait until now when we face our hardest run of games of the season?
Up front, with two starting, the hope was we would break our goalless run, but it does not matter if we have five up front if we are not getting the ball to them. With only four touches in the first half for Jamie Vardy, this is a problem that needs attention.
Too little, too late? Time will tell, but let us enjoy the fact that this was probably our best performance against a top-half team.
Find more from Chris Forryan at Leicester Till I Die, external
