rule against

When the courts rule against Donald Trump’s efforts to strip away those sections of the Constitution that he doesn’t like, such as the 14th Amendment’s language on birthright citizenship, then President Trump will have to make a momentous decision.

The rule against back-billing was introduced in 2018 in part to ensure energy suppliers keep their billing processes up-to-date.

Is he hoping that the Supreme Court will rule against this Musk and Project 2025 dumpster fire?

And even if the courts rule against the president, says Ilya Shapiro, a constitutional expert at the Manhattan Institute, those legal defeats might be politically advantageous.

“Some of those executive orders are so blatantly unconstitutional, one would expect any judge of any ideology to rule against them,” Chemerinsky said.