Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary

Rate this book
The student rebellions of the 1960s caught through the eyes of a Columbia College undergraduate during the spring of 1968. A classic that sold 35,000 copies in hardcover, The Strawberry Statement retains its appeal to college students sensitive to the world's injustices while confronting their own adult future.

168 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1969

33 people are currently reading
817 people want to read

About the author

James S. Kunen

5 books13 followers
James S. Kunen is the author of popular and critically praised books that grapple with legal and political issues in a personal way. A prize-winning journalist, he is best known for his 1968 memoir, The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary—his account of the antiwar student strike at Columbia. It has been translated into four languages and widely used in college history and writing courses. MGM’s film version of the book won the Jury Prize at the 1970 Cannes Film Festival.

Graduating from Columbia in 1970, Kunen was sent to Vietnam by True magazine to write a series of articles, which led to his book Standard Operating Procedure: Notes of a Draft-Age American (1971).

After working as a freelance journalist, Kunen earned his juris doctor degree from the New York University School of Law and joined the Public Defender Service in Washington, D.C., where he moved from misdemeanor cases to representing people accused of serious crimes, including murder. He recounted his experiences in ‘How Can You Defend Those People?’: The Making of a Criminal Lawyer (1983).

Returning to journalism, Kunen worked as an op-ed editor for Newsday, a contributing writer for Time magazine, and a featured writer and senior editor for news at People magazine, where he reported and wrote cover stories on Donald Trump, Tawana Brawley and Abbie Hoffman, among others. His reporting on a tragic school-bus crash led him to write a book, Reckless Disregard: Corporate Greed, Government Indifference, and the Kentucky School Bus Crash (1994).

Kunen left People in 2000 to serve as a director of corporate communications at Time Warner Inc. in New York City, where, among other things, his job was to maintain employee morale during the company’s merger with AOL and the rounds of layoffs that followed. In 2008, after being laid off himself, he embarked on a search for meaningful work that led him to his current position teaching English as a Second Language at LaGuardia Community College in Queens, N.Y. He describes the journey from corporate PR man to teacher of immigrants in his new memoir, Diary of a Company Man: Losing a Job, Finding a Life.

Kunen’s Time magazine cover story on the resegregation of America’s schools won him a First Place in Features award from the New York Association of Black Journalists and an award for reporting in education from Unity Awards in Media. As a freelance writer, he has written for The Atlantic, Esquire, GQ, Harper’s, New York, Sports Illustrated, The New York Times Magazine, and other leading publications. He was a columnist for a national magazine, New Times.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
141 (25%)
4 stars
202 (36%)
3 stars
160 (28%)
2 stars
40 (7%)
1 star
16 (2%)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 51 reviews
Profile Image for Katerina Charisi.
179 reviews67 followers
July 1, 2018
Δε νομίζω να έχω δώσει ποτέ μισό (!) αστεράκι σε βιβλίο εδώ μέσα, όμως από τη μια τα τρία του είναι πολλά, από την άλλη τα δύο λίγα. Ας πάμε λοιπόν κάπου στη μέση, με βιτρίνα το (μάλλον υποτιμητικό δυαράκι).

Το βιβλίο είναι ένα (ασυνάρτητο εδώ κι εκεί) ημερολόγιο 19χρονου, γενικά συμπαθή αλλά πάντα 19χρονου, πίσω στο (σχετικά) μακρινό '68. Ο τίτλος λένε ότι προέρχεται από μια απαξιωτική δήλωση πρύτανη του Κολούμπια για την συμμετοχή των φοιτητών στις αποφάσεις του πανεπιστημίου, οι οποίοι, όπως υποστήριξε, μπορούν να εκφέρουν μόνο ασήμαντες προσωπικές γνώμες όπως αν τους αρέσει ή όχι η γεύση της φράουλας.

Και θα μπορούσε ίσως αυτό να είναι και το μόνο ενδιαφέρον κομμάτι του βιβλίου.

Δεν το λες ιστορικό ντοκουμέντο, παρόλα αυτά τα κομμάτια του βιβλίου στα οποία αναφέρονται τα (με ημερολογιακό ύφος πάντα) γεγονότα έχουν τη βαρύτητά τους.

Δεν το λες ούτε γαργαλιστικό ημερολόγιο 19χρονου μιας γεμάτης εποχής από χίλια δυο ερεθίσματα - η μουσική πχ που αναφέρεται είναι ελάχιστη, ούτε πολιτικό ανάγνωσμα, ο Κούνεν αν και συμπαθητικός ήταν μάλλον συντηρητικοαδιάφορος, κάποιες δηλώσεις πιο ηχηρές έδειχναν σημεία ζωής κι ότι ναι, υπήρχε εγκέφαλος μέσα σε εκείνο το κεφάλι,

λέει και ωραία πραγματάκια εδώ κι εκεί.

Γενικά πολύς ντόρος για το (σχεδόν) τίποτα.

Η ταινία σαφώς ανώτερη, αφού ελάχιστα είναι τα κοινά σημεία με το βιβλίο, αν και εμπορικώς δραματοποιημένη για το σχετικό ντόρο.
Profile Image for Cecilia.
75 reviews40 followers
April 4, 2012
I lived a pretty sheltered suburban life in the Midwest when James S. Kunen was going to college at Columbia (NY) in the late '60s. I was some years younger than the author but sure remember the times...and yeah, "they were a changin'".

I re-read "The Strawberry Statement" over this past weekend for some reason...guess I just am nostalgic about the late '60s. Kunen sure nailed that time period of revolutions, sit-ins, love-ins, hassles with the police (I hate to use the term "pigs"...but that was what they were mostly called), working with the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) wanting to change the government for the better, protesting against the war in Vietnam, etc. all during 1968-69. The author was living all of this when he wrote his book in diary style...and he wrote it with great intelligence and humor for a young man of 19 yrs. Even then, Kunen had an open mind and still professed love for his country even as he wanted to change what he saw wrong with it. So...I ask you...what is wrong with that?

A wonderful, remarkable read for anyone wanting to find out what life was like in the late '60s for a young college student of 19 yrs. old trying to discover who he was, what he wanted to do with his life & what he could do to make life better for everyone. The book is still applicable in today's world...although today we are sadly missing Hendrix, Joplin, the Kennedy's, King...

More nostalgia on my part...not connected with this book since Woodstock was never mentioned and happened after the events written in "Strawberry Statement". I'd have been pretty young to head to Yasgur's Farm to attend Woodstock at that time...but I sure wanted to go...:> My mom would have never let me out of the house again if I'd attempted that "trip"…grounded for life! Scares me to think on it now...but she was right.

My paperback copy of "Strawberry Statement" is pretty old and brittle but it's still one of my favorite books and one I can go back to again & again and never tire of reading it. I recommend that you read it, too...you won't be sorry.
Profile Image for Jim.
Author 2 books37 followers
April 1, 2012
Not much has changed from those days. So many of Kunen's thoughts and observations are applicable today. Having grown up in a sheltered suburban enclave in the 60's I enjoy reading about what took place in the rest of the world at that time.

And...

I can honestly proclaim I was not at Woodstock...
Profile Image for Lisa McBrien.
58 reviews6 followers
May 6, 2024
I was a lowly student, slaving away in community college when I first found this at a used book sale on campus. I was the girl who questioned everything that was being taught in Government class, which is how I got labeled as a "Liberal/Radical" by my professor. But seriously, I am not a Liberal, I'm a Radical Leftist to the core, i'm as far left as you can go without wanting to kill people or bomb buildings. And yes, as a member of Generation X, I realize that my fight was vastly different than Kunen's. However, as you read this story, you will realize that Kunen didn't always agree with the attitudes of Mark Rudd & the SDS ilk. In fact, my attitude is very much like Kunen's in that if had I actually occupied a building, I probably would have sat on the ledge sunning myself reading "Lord Jim," which is actually a really good book. I can't say I've ever been arrested, but I certainly don't like the police, and yet I don't advocate violence against them either. As for the "Never trust anyone over 30" sentiment, I agree with Kunen in principle that we should drop the 0, but now that I'm almost 50, I think my age ought to be the marker. What makes this story so engaging and, as the author would say, "Mildly Amusing," is that he isn't trying to get you to like him or pounding you over the head with rhetoric. He's simply telling you what he's experienced and what he saw as a participant in a movement. In today's terms we have the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (Vietnam), widespread gentrification (Morningside Park), Police brutality and racisim (Ferguson, current Anti Muslim sentiment, immigration), and messed up institutions (Represented by political scandals, recessions, mounting student loan debt, and the Occupy Movement). The era may be different in terms of what Kunen and other RLs were fighting against, but the spirit pretty much remains true today. And for Generation Y, reading this book will be a real wake up call...yes children there were days, long ago when long hair was frowned upon, when cohabitation was unheard of and could actually get you kicked out of school, and when institutions like Coulumbia could actually usurp large peices of land in the name of expansion, offer to build a "community center" and "graciously" offer to let the African American members of said neighborhood use the facilities in a limited fashion if they entered through a seprate door. Blows your mind, doesn't it?
Profile Image for Georgina K. Koutrouditsou.
427 reviews
June 24, 2018
Περίμενα πολλά περισσότερα,λόγω της εκπληκτικής ταινίας!
Με κούρασε το ημερολογιακό ύφος των γεγονότων.
Ο αφηγητής πολλές φορές γίνεται κουραστικός με την άτοπη κριτική του.
Profile Image for columbialion.
255 reviews1 follower
December 23, 2011
When I came to Columbia in 1972, the last of the 68' freshman were graduating. Aside from the odd reminiscent conversations I had eavesdropped on, (because direct conversations rarely existed between freshman and seniors) the events of the CU student revolts had largely slipped into a realm of apathy and indifference. All of the major players were gone, as was the administration of Grayson Kirk, replaced by William McGill along with most of the Columbia Board of Trustees. So strangely, new students were of course made aware of what had happened on campus in 68' (mainly b/c most to all matriculating freshman classes are in Hamilton Hall, a central site of the protests) the exploits of Mark Rudd, the SDS etc were rapidly becoming somewhat characteristic of urban legend.
Author Jim Kunen's "Strawberry Statement" is truly an eyewitness, boots on the ground chronicling of the events of that turbulent era of 1968 at Columbia, from the perspective of the activists AND the issues of war, injustice and racism, they were trying to remedy. The only other book offering a direct reporting from inside College Walk at Morningside in 68', is the rather sterile compilation of the Columbia Spectator (school newspaper) articles entitled "Up Against the Ivy Wall"
Reading Strawberry now, is particularly timely with the advent of the current Occupy Wall Street protests in NYC and elsewhere. The parallels to the Columbia revolt are considerable, both were organized by way of clear perception and disillusionment of college aged youth that the existing political status quo was an unacceptable manipulated ruse, perpetrated on an unaware, repressed American society, and a belief that only through civil disobedience and disruption to societal norms could force change. Kuen's book delivers the visuals of the violence exhibited by NYPD to clear the Columbia campus; similar to the controversial tactics now on display in Zuccotti Park. Kuen also incorporates his philosophical processing of what it was like to be a youth in America in 68', observing an unending war in Vietnam (which threatened all draft aged kids), the blatant racism on exhibition in the American south through the likes of George Wallace and other enemies to civil rights. But most of all, the author communicates the core feelings of political hopelessness that permeated through the nations youth, a feeling that unseen forces (the establishment, war,government and ultimately any legitimate authority figure) had stacked the deck against them and needed to be defeated.
Profile Image for Emily✨.
1,878 reviews45 followers
August 7, 2018
Isn’t it singular that no one ever goes to jail for waging wars, let alone advocating them? But the jails are filled with those who want peace. Not to kill is to be a criminal. They put you right into jail if all you do is ask them to leave you alone. Exercising the right to live is a violation of law. (61)

[My mother] points out that neither Gandhi nor Thoreau would have asked for amnesty. I admit I haven’t read them. But Gandhi had no Gandhi to read and Thoreau hadn’t read Thoreau. They had to reach their own conclusions and so will I. (29)

This diary-format eye-witness look at the rebellion of Columbia University students in 1968 was a lot more interesting than I expected it to be. It helped that the author's writing voice was actually a delight-- Kunen was hilarious and cynical and I laughed out loud quite often, especially in the first half.

I can assure you that the Columbia action cannot be dismissed as an overgrown panty raid, a manifestation of the vernal urge. It lasted too long; participants endured hardship, and worse, boredom, conditions through which collegiate fetishistic folly could never sustain itself. (150)

I didn't know anything specifically about the protests at Columbia, though of course I knew that 1968 was a year of great social upheaval in the US in general. I chose to read The Strawberry Statement for a more general look at student protesting fifty years ago and compare it to the current social situation.

The moderator [...]said that what [adults] are doing today is paying the penalty for years of permissiveness, which is true, if permissiveness means raising kids to think and not obey any authority that happens to come stomping along.
All concurred that we students “should be busy studying to be leaders instead of carping about things.”
(57-58)

What I found is that... things haven't really changed much. Or maybe they've even gotten worse? It was a trip to see the same sentiments that feminists and anti-racists write think-pieces about today being written by a 19-year-old in 1968. Much of this book could easily be applied to contemporary events.

In America you shouldn’t have to worry about police busting into your apartment and beating you up. I specifically remember seeing a TV show around thirteen years ago about an immigrant couple who still had their old country fears and thought the mailman was a cop coming to take them away. They weren’t confused; they were just ahead of their time. (79)

The format of this book isn't the best. As it is a published diary, there is some context missing from much of the events described; possibly if I knew more about the specific events I wouldn't have felt so lost. Instead, I was confused about what exactly was happening, especially in the second half of the book, when Kunen lost some of his clear-headed-ness and became noticeably confused, apathetic, and depressed in turns. Still, since it was more interest in the general sentiment of the time, rather than research into the specifics, I didn't mind feeling confused. I was still interested in Kunen's ponderings. I also read the book in short bursts over almost a month, as the author himself suggests it is best consumed in small doses due to the general disorganization of his thoughts.

Most people agree that there are good cops and bad. But everybody assumes that there have to be cops, that there always have been. I have no plan for abolishing police forces, but I do think people should consider that police are not the most natural thing in the world [...]It seems strange to me that a few men should be taken from the community and given the job of watching out for it. […H]e’s got his club and his gun and everybody seems to think that’s the way it’s supposed to be. (140)

Commenting on the importance of student opinion to the administration, Professor Deane declared, “Whether the students vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on an issue is like telling me they like strawberries.” (121)

Kunen paints quite the picture of the reactions of school administration, fellow students, police, media, and general citizens to the rebelling Columbia students. It was incredible to read about police brutality at peaceful protests and marches-- including an incident when NYPD purposefully barricaded the Columbia campus to pen in the student protesters, covered their badges with tape, then proceeded to use their bully clubs, rubber bullets, and tear gas to round up and arrest the students. Kunen himself was arrested in this instance.

Think twice before you pour your stinking bloody money into more weapons because people are hungry and we won’t let you. We need good schools and houses for people to live in and it could be done and we’re going to make this country do it. (94)

I can't say how Kunen's writings on race relations of the time were received when this was first published, but there was certainly some problematic terminology by today's standards. Kunen often refers to "the blacks", and often in differentiation from "the students" indicating that none of the students were black. Later in the book there is mention of black students, leaving the reader to wonder whether black students were part of the protests and what they thought of the whole situation. In other words, Kunen's account is not very intersectional in scope; but, then, it is a personal diary, not a thoroughly researched exposé. There was also a metaphor comparing the Viet Cong to cockroaches which, while not specifically pejorative, certainly was in bad taste.

Social progress is slow. It’s practically nonexistent. We’re about where we were 10,000 years ago. But you have to try to make it go fast so that it will go slow at all. (102)

I've noticed that a few different reviewers have concluded that The Strawberry Statement demonstrates that student protesters don't know what they're doing. I'd say, duh, of course they don't, who ever knows what they're doing? But protesters don't have to know everything to know that what they're witnessing is wrong, and to know that they can do something about it. Even when Kunen becomes apathetic, it is out of frustration with the different factions and the infighting that hinders any real progress, not because he has decided that there's nothing worth fighting for.

But sadness is not despair so long as you can get angry. And we have become angry at Columbia. Not having despaired, we are able to see things that need to be fought, and we fight. We have fought, we are fighting, we will fight. (6)

I think one of the biggest take-aways from this book is that there's nothing new about criticizing the American government. "Make America Great Again"? And when exactly was it great before? There are problems running deep in this country, and pointing them out doesn't make you an "SJW", "snowflake", or "commie" today any more than it did in 1968, or 1908, or 1861, and on and on. As the saying goes, if you're not angry, you're not paying attention. Though it's somewhat disheartening to see how little has changed since 1968, I think it's clear that the movements have grown and have encompassed more and more people over the generations. (It seems to me that) there are more different kinds of people talking about and caring about social change today than in the past, which provides some hope for an eventual tipping point, hopefully not too long in the future.

There used to be a dream for America. You know, the American dream? America was going to be different. Free. Good. Free and good. Of course they blew it right away. As soon as the Puritans came over they set up religious laws. But at least they clung to the dream. Until now. Now no one hopes for America to be different. I guess it was the dream that ruined the dream. People became convinced it was true, so they never made it true. People think the U.S.A. (a great-sounding, nice, informal name) is special, so we can do anything and it’s okay (an American expression). People should wake up and dream again. (64)

[All bolding is mine]
Profile Image for isabella veneris.
11 reviews
May 25, 2024
A lot of people might scoff at the phrase “College Revolutionary”, but frankly, I don’t know if I’ve read a book that better encapsulates a certain naïveté and the simplicity of caring as well as The Strawberry Statement.

The book doesn’t try to be anything other than a recounting of student protests and student life at Columbia University in the 60s, and that’s what makes it so special. There’s no sense of entitlement that people often make the mistake of assuming from young activists— instead, you’re treated to an earnest collection of notes from someone who is trying to make sense of the world around them, and for that, you can’t fault it.

Incredibly timely and an easy read!
Profile Image for 1.1.
480 reviews10 followers
May 8, 2019
'My friends and I became preoccupied with the common nostalgic assertion that "these are the best years of your lives." We could accept the fact that the college years are exhausting, confusing, boring, troubled, frustrating, and meaningless—that we could take in stride; we'd seen hard times before. But that everything subsequent would be worse was a concept difficult to grasp and, once grasped, impossible to accept.'

There's a feeling I remember in detail, and one that I've never quite gotten over, myself.
The plots of Them, in fact, became so incomprehensibly multifarious that it seemed the only way to avoid them was never to leave your room or, ideally, your bed. But that might be playing right into Their hands.

Clear, simple, short and probably very relatable to anyone who has ever been at university while things went down and later turned into a fairly mild person. Not that the author, even at his age writing the book, was not mild. This slim volume is infused with a mildness that makes it easy to read while still making some good, interesting, or cool points. The writing is very mild, almost glib even, but that makes the whole book extremely digestible.
...we're all people. We're all together in this thing, so we could feel very close to each other about it and say all right, we're al lkind of weak and bad but we're going to the best we can and try to muddle through everything together because there's nowhere to go and there's nothing else to be. That way everyone could be fairly happy because no one would hate anybody. But man, talk about incredibly unrealistic utopian impossibilities!
Profile Image for Noel.
122 reviews
April 20, 2008
(Review written Jan 2003 and thus kind of dated): This book, written by a kid my age (19), resonates very strongly with me, as a member of a new generation of college revolutionaries. [Ed: awww, so idealistic!] The parallels between his experiences protesting Columbia University's worker policies and involvement in the Vietnam War with the impending war in Iraq today are striking. Overall a good read that has valuable things to say and chilling relevance to today's situation.
Profile Image for Ηλίας Α..
22 reviews15 followers
March 29, 2014
"Μιλώντας για την επιρροή που ασκεί στη διοίκηση του πανεπιστημίου η γνώμη των φοιτητών, ο κοσμήτωρ Ντην διακήρυξε: «Όταν οι φοιτητές ψηφίζουν “ναι” ή “όχι” επάνω σ' ένα δεδομένο θέμα, είναι σα να μου λένε πως τους αρέσουν ή δεν τους αρέσουν οι φράουλες».
Εμένα μ' αρέσουν οι φράουλες."
Profile Image for Garrett Zecker.
Author 9 books63 followers
July 30, 2020
The Strawberry Statement was one of those surprise purchases from a library book sale. There was something about a slim volume with a rare Vonnegut quote on the cover (and then, also, the comparison to Vonnegut by one of the other quotes) and the author’s full Social Security Number on the back that seemed to catch my eye. With a meager investment of a quarter, The Strawberry Statement sat on my TBR pile for a while, but its length and captivating opening pages made me pick it up recently.

Kunen is no Vonnegut... But he did create a book with a vibrancy and energy that is unlike a lot of what I have read before. The timeliness of picking this piece up when I did is undeniable. I read it through our current crisis – COVID and a variety of flashpoint uprisings that have reemerged throughout our country as once again we have to remind law enforcement that Black Lives, do in fact, Matter. Police violence responding to people taking to the streets – peacefully – to protest the police violence that came before it. And so on. And so on.

Kunen’s book comes from another era where the stakes seemed to be high. However, the federal government wasn’t sending storm troopers to arrest protesting civilians and throw them into unmarked vans to take them to who knows where. Today's federal government also keeps kids in cages and is in cahoots with a variety of dictatorships, our executive branch calling Nazis ‘very fine people.’ Here, we see young people engaged in a war unlike the war of today’s federal totalitarian force. Kunen's era wanted peace, wanted an end to the Vietnam war, and simply wanted their colleges to take them seriously rather than creating kangaroo courts of ballot initiatives given a gravity as lucrative as whether the students prefer strawberries in the dining halls or not... or whatever. Not to give the book away, but administration didn’t care, and they didn’t do anything about it.

And this was in a time when tuitions were low, enrollment was way less than it is today, and Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young could dominate a soundtrack of disruption.

I was shocked at the relevance to today’s warriors of peace... Not that it was particularly edgy or bold at the time – because it was - but that the same illegal, violent tactics of suppression and dominance have only increased since then. So have the same issues that haven’t gone away. In fact, I have no idea why Kunen hasn’t been on national news broadcasts espousing his absolute disgust (and personal experience) regarding the increase in suppression and violence since writing The Strawberry Statement.

After reading the novel, I found the film and watched that as well. The book cover espoused that a ‘new kind of film from MGM’ directed by Stuart Hagmann was on its way. It won the Cannes Jury Prize in 1970.

Full disclosure side note: I personally think Hal Ashby’s Harold and Maude is the greatest film ever made. A young Bud Cort stars in both pieces. He was nominated for a Best Actor Golden Globe in 1972, as was Ruth Gordon for Best Actress. Undeniably, that year was almost impossible to shoulder into recognition competing with The French Connection, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, A Clockwork Orange, The Last Picture Show, Fiddler on the Roof, Brian’s Song, Summer of ‘42, Shaft, The Andromeda Strain, A Simple Story, MASH... I mean, bonkers films... And The Strawberry Statement saunters in amid these films that continue to be Hollywood icons even today, directed by a a relatively unknown television director with only a few motion picture credits to his name.

The film is problematic in many ways. While Kunen’s book is encouraged to be completely torn apart and read in any order (and I would say one can, albeit in varying levels of success) as it was written, the film fails in many ways to achieve that same level of grassroots momentum. First, it is a relatively unfilmable book. The development of the movement and Kunen’s involvement in it being as patchwork as the narrative is. But what the director does is attempt to subvert the accepted modern method of filmmaking – I mean, one of the most violent moments in the book involves a movie camera – but many other directors had done much more with much less prior to 1971. The result is a cinematic pastiche that contains a lot of shots, cuts, dialogue, sets, and execution that has not only been done before with way more success, but in this case was done in a way that seems to pander to a wide-release audience that doesn’t seem to know any better. In fact, the film contains one of the worst lines delivered by one of my favorite actors of all time:

Elliot Coxswain: [describing a large breasted woman who looks for Simon] Do you remember that... National Geographic you have in your back room?

Simon : [laughs] Yeah.

Elliot Coxswain : Yeah, well this one is a white version of page 43.

Listen... Reading this book during the Black Lives Matter movement of 2020 was inspiring, but watching the film during it after feeling so inspired felt terrible. It isn’t the worst movie I have ever seen, but it is a very bad film that feels as though it is pandering and artsy in a manner that is probably the most artless way possible. Trying too hard, with too much studio money, depicting a time that was comparatively only a little difficult for white kids that are lucky enough to be going to college and their big fallutin’ rules. But there are redeeming “*#$! the police” and “black lives matter” moments in the film.


In today’s lens, the movie almost feels like a parody of the arthouse film. It’s most redeeming quality is its killer soundtrack. It opens and closes with Bruce Davidson spinning with a duffel bag on his head like a hit-you-over-the-head, culturally appropriated whirling dervish. Is it a symbol? You better believe that was the point, and the rest of the film also feels like it is hitting you over the head with similarly obvious moments and crazy camera angles that are simply too much.

Earlier I espoused the beauty of my favorite film, Harold and Maude. Sure, it isn’t without its moments of obvious arthouse fare, but in Ashby’s work, we aren’t bludgeoned with it for the entirety of the film. A groan with the wooden sculpture, fireworks, and a quick cut of Gordon’s arm tattoo are easily forgiven with a tour of a garbage painting of “lady and the swan with egg underneath and an elephant,” an endlessly forgiving keychain of keys, and fields of daisies like tombstones set to the music of Cat Stevens. Listen, it’s there, but it is so damn beautiful that by the end you want to die a dignified death and love all you can as well as Cort and Gordon’s characters did. And I think The Strawberry Statement is trying to do this, but fails horribly. It was great seeing youthful Davidson, Cort, Darby, Balabin, Margotta, and the author himself destroy their performances in the film – but the direction, cinematography, and editing were so heavy handed I had a hard time even getting through it.

Kunen’s novel is a brilliant and sophisticated narrative about his personal experience during the Columbia riots he lived through firsthand. The violence of the police and administration in the book have only increased since he wrote the book over fifty years ago. The timeliness of its impact on America has only grown since he penned the book. I wish the film was as groundbreaking as it purported to be, but no matter – this book should be in the hands of every young person in America questioning the systems of oppression we have grown to accept. It is the handbook and blueprint of safely and nonviolently subverting the system, and we all deserve to finally be free of it.
Profile Image for Beth.
2 reviews
September 27, 2007
Definately one of my all time favorite books. Read it if you can get your hands on a copy.
Profile Image for Rahadyan.
279 reviews21 followers
July 28, 2011
My favorite non-fiction book of my junior high and high school years. Sometimes I look back at that idealistic self. Worth revisiting in my middle years.
Profile Image for Marianna Sharktooth.
425 reviews19 followers
April 16, 2020
Το βρήκα λίγο δήθεν και κουραστικό. Πέραν των ανθρωπίνων μηνυμάτων, θεωρών οτι είναι απίστευτα κακογραμμένο και θωλό.
Profile Image for sergevernaillen.
217 reviews4 followers
April 30, 2019
Ooit heb ik de gelijknamige film gezien en als jonge adolescent had die behoorlijk wat indruk op mij gemaakt. Zoals veel van mij generatiegenoten waren we toen nogal revolutionair ingesteld (althans in onze hoofden) en alles wat met protesten tegen de gevestigde orde te maken had kon onze goedkeuring dragen.

Enkele jaren geleden kwam ik die film via een docu over de jaren zestig-protesten weer in mijn gedachten. Ik heb heel wat moeten zoeken om dit boek te pakken te krijgen maar ik besef nu dat dat veel moeite was voor weinig resultaat.

Zoals de ondertitel weergeeft zijn het dus niet veel meer dan nota’s over de protesten aan de Columbia University in New York. Zie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbi....

Kunen heeft die meegemaakt en heeft er ook aan deelgenomen. Maar, zoals blijkt uit zijn nota’s, niet altijd met veel overtuiging. Dagboeksgewijs beschrijft hij zijn activiteiten tijdens deze periode en dat is niet altijd even boeiend om te lezen. Bij momenten is het zelfs stomvervelend maar er zitten gelukkig ook enkele goede passages in. Kunen probeert er hier en daar wat humor in te verweven maar dat is ook maar hier en daar echt geslaagd.

Ik denk dat de scenarioschrijver die uit dit boek een aaneenhangend scenario voor de film heeft weten te puren meer moeite heeft moeten doen.
Profile Image for Kenalia.
7 reviews
May 9, 2018
This book was assigned to me for a university US History class. Originally, I was not expecting to enjoy the book since I have never enjoyed much reading that has been assigned to me, but I ended up really enjoying it.

Kunen's writing is very disjointed (and he points this out early), but after the initial event chapters the information is a lot easier to follow. This is a downside to most people, but after multiple readings of those chapters, it is fairly simple to piece the information together and get a unique insider-look of the event.

Being nonfiction, I tried to follow many of the interviews and radio shows that Kunen describes appearing on, but either he wasn't important enough for those to saved, or I simply didn't look hard enough. Who knows.

Kunen is definitely a teenager, and if you aren't the type that enjoys shallow-yet-introspective nightwalks, you might not enjoy the second half of this book.

If you are interested in the Columbia University protests, and especially the atmosphere of New York / the Counter Culture surrounding the event, then this is definitely a great book for you!
Profile Image for Daisy.
70 reviews
Read
March 8, 2024
It's strange to read this in 2024, nearly 60 years after it was originally published, and hear such a contemporary voice and see how little has changed.

There are some things that have changed, of course -- jocks haven't been apoliticized yet (and actively support a warring administration), ACAB is still a fringe idea, and protesting students didn't have the option to spectate from the comfort of a Twitter handle.

But so much still remains the same, namely the idealism of youth coming to terms with the ugly decisions made before them, and the complexity of grappling with the injustice of those systems even as one benefits from those very same systems.

When I compare how the sixties are remembered to this firsthand account of how this author actually experienced it, I think the cognitive dissonance is very similar to how I feel about how my nineties childhood is remembered, namely how it is sanitized and safely repackaged for Gen Z consumption. But then this is what every older generation says about the generation after it. It makes me wonder how much has been forgotten and how much can still be rediscovered.
Profile Image for Natasha Anastasiou.
112 reviews1 follower
December 8, 2024
Η γραφή του χαρακτηρίζεται από μια ειλικρινή, μερικές φορές σουρεαλιστική, εξερεύνηση προσωπικών και πολιτικών συγκρούσεων, που συνδυάζει τα απομνημονεύματα με ένα χαρακτηριστικό, συχνά παιχνιδιάρικο, ενδοσκοπικό ύφος. Ένα πολύ σημαντικό βιβλίο καθώς είναι μια προσωπική αφήγηση του James S. Kunen, που καταγράφει τις έντονες φοιτητικές διαμαρτυρίες στο Πανεπιστήμιο Columbia κατά τη διάρκεια των εξεγέρσεων στην πανεπιστημιούπολη το 1968. Προσφέρει μια εσωστρεφή ματιά στον ιδεαλισμό, τις απογοητεύσεις και την κοινωνική αναταραχή της εποχής, αποτυπώνοντας τόσο τη ζέση του ακτιβισμού της νεολαίας όσο και την πολυπλοκότητα της πολιτικής δέσμευσης.

Είναι πολύ καλό βιβλίο το οποίο αποτυπώνει την ενέργεια και τον ιδεαλισμό των φοιτητικών διαδηλώσεων του 1968 στο Πανεπιστήμιο Columbia, προσφέροντας μια αυθεντική ματιά σε μια ταραχώδη περίοδο της αμερικανικής ιστορίας. Ωστόσο, μου φάνηκε κάπως δύσκολο να σχετιστώ με ορισμένα σημεία, καθώς η νεανική οπτική του συγγραφέα για την εξέγερση και τον ακτιβισμό ένιωθε πιο αποκομμένη από το σημερινό πολιτικό τοπίο. Όμως, είναι ένα βιβλίο που όντως αξίζει να διαβαστεί και το προτείνω Ανεπιφύλακτα!
1,189 reviews22 followers
May 20, 2019
there's something interesting here in that james simon kunen seems, as a nineteen year old, fairly caught up in being objective here and not making a hero out of himself (which is good because he's not, remotely); the protests at columbia in 1968, over the IDA's relationship with Columbia as well as the school's attempt to place a gym in a park, were confusing and not well thought out. they were an expression of rage by smart kids who were still kids. kunen here captures the energy and boredom, the at-odds feelings of that protest and the occupation of the dean's office. In the first third of the book. At which point the book forgets what it's about and decenters itself, losing setting to a diary of abstractions and specifics that aren't really related to the abstraction. it mirrors smart young person's life pretty accurately: boredom with bursts of anger and desire to change things, tied down with an afterward to is ultimately depressing as hell but what at the time seems like a statement of purpose.
52 reviews3 followers
Read
February 28, 2024
THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT--- NOTES OF A COLLEGE REVOLUTIONARY, BY JAMES SIMON KUNEN
COMMENTS BY JEFF KEITH
[five stars] I am just a shade older than the first Baby Boomers, and I love to read books like this. This is a first-person account of some adventures that I can identify with, and its writing style is nice and clear. It reads like a diary, with entries dated by days. It starts just after high school and then describes his freshman year at Columbia University in New York. The school year of 1967-68 was his sophomore year. The most interesting part of the book for me was his description of the spring and summer of 1968 when he took part in the student uprising at Columbia.
I love finding books about people’s radical adventures between 1968 and 1975, when I was a young adult doing a variety of those types of things. I am amazed that Kunen was just nineteen when he wrote this and got it published as a book. I found it well written and a joy to read. So it’s no wonder what Goodreads’s biography says that he became a professional writer in later years.
Profile Image for Bandw53.
86 reviews3 followers
November 13, 2020
Nostalgia e tenerezza.
Il film, certo non un capolavoro, credo di averlo visto almeno dieci volte. Negli anni perdeva la sua valenza politica e aumentavano la dolce tristezza dei giorni perduti e l'ingenuità. Il libro esce in Italia nel 2016 e riprende il titolo del film che nell'originale suonava "The Strawberry Statement" secondo l'affermazione del preside Dean della Columbia University di NYC ("Sapere se gli studenti approvano o disapprovano una decisione per me conta tanto quanto sapere che gli piacciono le fragole").
Le proteste studentesche della seconda metà degli anni 60 negli States cominciano da lì e hanno bersagli importanti: razzismo, povertà, guerra. Per certi versi attualissimi.
La visione é quella di uno studente rivoluzionario, come si definisce Kunen, della buona borghesia della costa orientale, non violento e disincantato.
Il valore del libro, per chi in quegli anni é cresciuto, é la nostalgia. Per tutti gli altri non é una lettura fondamentale.
Profile Image for Georgina.
3 reviews
April 14, 2021
"Είμαστε γεμάτοι φόβους κι ελπίδες ή, καθώς λένε, μεταπτώσεις."

Οι εμπειρίες ενός φοιτητή από τις "μικρές" καθημερινές στιγμές της φοιτητικής ζωής μέχρι και την μεγάλη εξέγερση των φοιτητών το 1968 στο Columbia University ενάντια στην πρυτανεία, που υποστήριζε σθεναρά τον πόλεμο του Βιετνάμ, και τις πολιτικές φυλετικών διακρίσεων που ακολουθούσε. Ένας φοιτητής που αρχικά αδιάφορος για την πολιτική, σταδιακά όμως ήρθε σε σύγκρουση τόσο με το κατεστημένο της εποχής, όσο και με την αστυνομική βία που δεν είχε όρια.

"Φράουλες και Αίμα", ο τίτλος λέγεται ότι προέρχεται από μια δήλωση του πρύτανη του Κολούμπια, ο οποίος υποστήριξε, ότι οι φοιτητές μπορούν να εκφέρουν μόνο ασήμαντες προσωπικές γνώμες όπως αν τους αρέσει ή όχι η γεύση της φράουλας. Οι φοιτητές απέδειξαν ότι είναι απρόβλεπτοι, πολυπλευροι και αγωνιστές, και πόσο ικανοί στο να εκφέρουν γνώμη.

Αληθινό - Γεμάτο - Επίκαιρο
Profile Image for Carol Cleaveland.
6 reviews3 followers
April 5, 2019
I devoured this book as a high school sophomore after seeing snippets on the movie on late night TV. Kunen presents a thoughtful account of the unrest at Columbia University in 1968, during a period in which students globally began to question the social order. Many did so at their own peril, unfortunately. Kunen and others were beaten by police for their non-violent occupation of the university library. That year in Mexico City, hundreds of student activists were murdered by police.

Kunen's gives an account of his experiences at Columbia that is neither strident nor maudlin, an accomplishment for a 19-year-old author.
Profile Image for Dawn Klinge.
Author 7 books78 followers
August 15, 2020
As a reader in 2020, I found this book about the 1968 Columbia riots quite interesting. It seemed as if it could have been written today to describe current events with the racial justice protests. James Kunen writes in an engaging fashion and includes many humorous moments. I appreciated the look into the thinking of a college revolutionary from a time in the past. It showed that history has a way of repeating itself.
Profile Image for Devon  :~).
112 reviews1 follower
June 2, 2024
The first 50 or so pages of this were really interesting especially in the midst of student protests calling for divestment from Israel. I recognized my peers often in the pages! I will say it’s incredibly lackluster beyond those 50 or so pages. The rest reads like a 19 year old kid who is still figuring a lot of things out. Which is okay and allowed! But not great for a book, but I think kunen knew that, acknowledged it, and didn’t care
167 reviews1 follower
September 5, 2022
having been on the cusp of this revolution, and having rowed in college I found it necessary to read this memoir... very interesting, and of course relevant to today.. it's sort of scary when the students are talking about revolution for all the right things, and then you have these crazy moron maga nuts out there talking about revolution for all the wrong reasons
Profile Image for Hannah Butler.
40 reviews2 followers
August 31, 2024
Great for people who are interested in a Columbia revolution & journalism in the 60s. Not so great for people who don’t like reading ADHD style paragraphs with little to none context. Three stars for the little insights of wisdom and humor sprinkled throughout.
Profile Image for stadtfisch.
83 reviews19 followers
February 20, 2021
Aus dem amerikanischen Englisch ins Deutsche übersetzt von David Wittenberg gelesen unter dem Titel „Das Erdbeer Manifest; Notizen zur Columbia Revolte“, erschienen 1969 im März Verlag Darmstadt.

[english below]

Das Zitat von Kurt Vonnegut auf dem hier abgebildeten Cover der englischen Ausgabe ist tragikomisch, weil ich beim Lesen eher das Gegenteil empfunden habe. Eher: Naiv, uninformiert, ... rückblickend kam es wohl wie es kommen musste, wenn dergleichen Personen Hoffnungsträger darstellen sollten. Trotzdem interessant und der westberliner Spät-68er, dem ich das via booklooker für 8€ abgekauft hab, war ein Süßer, der meinte, da habe ich mir ein spannendes Buch ausgesucht, auch wenn er es leider nicht zu Ende gelesen hätte. Naja, habe trotz meines Fazits die Völkerfreundschaft mit dem Westberliner Linken kurz gefühlt.
-----
The Kurt Vonnegut quote pictured on the cover of the english edition here is tragicomical to me, because I rather felt the opposite while reading. Rather: Naive, uninformed, ... looking back it seems things happened as they were bound to happen, if people like that were some supposed white hope [I've never heard of this term, the German word "Hoffnungsträger", literally translates to "carrier of hope"]. Nonetheless it was interesting and the westberliner late-68er I bought the book off of on booklooker for 8€, was a sweetheart who said I picked a fascinating book, although he unfortunately had never read it entirely himself. Well, despite my own conclusions about it I felt a short moment of friendship of the peoples with this westberlin leftist.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 51 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.